• BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    The neighbouring properties were separated by a chain link fence, with a cedar hedge comprised on the side owned by a numbered company, 0973210 B.C. Ltd, according to the decision.

    Annnd you lost me

    • Saraphim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Did you read the rest or did you stop there ? The lady repeatedly trespassed, was warned by the police she was trespassing and reduced healthy 15ft trees to 5 feet tall by repeatedly cutting them with a chainsaw.

      Imagine you’re renting a place and your psycho neighbour keeps hacking your trees with a chainsaw.

      Company owned or individually owned, that has nothing to do with it.

      • phx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah we had a neighbor who didn’t like our tree and went up at nice to partly saw branches, do that it would look like they fell naturally during the next windstorm. Some people are just pricks and others’ greenery

    • lasagna
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like a company owns the house and lets it out.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I despise corporations and investment properties, but.I hate Karen’s too. In the end she fucked around and found out, whoever owned the damaged property is irrelevant.