• MrEff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I can’t find where I read it, but I remember it being something like: if all of humanity consumed the same amount as an energy hungry American and then doubled it while getting all of its power from geothermal then we have almost tapped 1% of the crusts potential, rounding up.

    • MrEff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      I did some looking around. Looks like I was a factor of 10 off. As in- not 1% but 0.1% and that could be sustained for millions of years

      Other estimates suggest that harnessing just 0.1% of the Earth’s heat could supply the world’s total energy needs for two million years>

      https://www.contrary.com/foundations-and-frontiers/geothermal

      https://www.energy.gov/eere/geothermal/geothermal-faqs#:~:text=4.5 billion years.-,This heat is continually replenished by the decay of naturally,essentially inexhaustible supply of energy.

      There is also a great pdf over at www.worldenergy.org under their geothermal - world energy council that is a little old but still points out the math on just how immense the energy output of earth is. We could each run our own small AI data center on geothermal power and the earth would still have extra. And we are only talking about tapping into the very top of the crust.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Now add AI technology and crypto mining and anything else we might come up with in the near future.

    • gibmiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Is that 1% replenished? If not then we would have problems in a short couple decade.

      At what % does the crust start to experience cooling? What biological systems could be effected? What about tectonic systems?

      Tons of real legitimate questions here.

      • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It does cool down the surrounding rock, which means there’s less potential power output the more you try to use it.

        But it’s also a rock floating on a pool of magma, it warms back up relatively quickly.

        • FaceDeer@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I read a proposal a while back for using the Yellowstone magma chamber for geothermal power generation. It’s not currently in danger of erupting as a supervolcano, but the paper worked the numbers and showed that it would actually be feasable with realistic engineering to tap enough heat from the magma chamber to literally “defuse” it if it actually came to that. And turn a profit while doing so.