• I Cast Fist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    So, Nintendo made it so only pirates can get the digital game now?

    🏴‍☠️

    • finkrat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Piracy is a service delivery failure

      While it won’t stop everyone, if that game were freely available I’m sure there would be several less folks emulating them right now

    • Glytch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Emulate the old games. Unlike the original SMAS, 3d All-Stars added nothing to the experience that can’t be done with emulation. I say this as someone who bought it.

    • Matija Šuklje@toot.si
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      @ICastFist, AFAIK, if you bought it, you can still download it (similar case with Mushihimesama and Killer Queen Black).

      But yeah, odd choice, esp. for a Nintendo game and a game that needs no online.

      @LiamTheBox

  • slimerancher@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    I remember hearing from many people, “I wasn’t going to buy it, but it’s only available for a limited period, don’t want to miss out on it”.

    I voted with my wallet, and didn’t buy it. I lost the vote though, since it sold pretty well.

    Which explains why they did it. They created some hype, and earned some money, and still kept it for making some quick money by remaster / re-release when needed.

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Reads like it was written by an ai:

    • drones on with tangential information
    • doesn’t answer the question
    • Walican132@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean the first sentence answered the question. It was available for a limited time due to 35th anniversary. It’s a dumb reason but the answer is right there.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s a rhetorical non-answer, “the 35th anniversary release was only available for a limited time because it was only available for a limited time”.

        There are hundreds of anniversary releases of games that are made permanently available - hence why people asked Nintendo why this one was given an artificially short availability so often that it became an FAQ question. They own the rights, they can sell it indefinitely if they want.

        Eg: search Steam for ‘anniversary’ you’ll find 600+ results.

  • misk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    „Japanese like it this way and we’re a Japanese company, deal with it” is a perfectly fine explanation. Japanese consumers love limited drops.

  • fpslem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Also, it should have had Super Mario Galaxy 2, it was crappy that they went from 4 games down to 3 for that All Star collection.

    • Batman@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Thanks. I’ve never had the urge so bad to click no on the “Is this info helpful” question before.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yeah, I had to buy a physical copy of eBay for like 90 bucks. It was bullshit, but my kid wanted it for his birthday and I couldn’t say no.

  • Weebdeluxe@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why exactly are we still bringing this up? We all know it was a shitty thing to do… this post reeks of ragebait.