• BurntPunk
      link
      fedilink
      1081 year ago

      Some MOST things just shouldn’t be connected to the internet.

      FTFY

    • Franzia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      Unfortunately connecting this kink to the internet facilitates doing it. Having the device itself connect for ease of use had caused an unbelievable amount of tech issues, though. To be fair the programmer is a dipshit, though.

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      191 year ago

      But that just makes connecting those things to the internet forbidden… and therefore alluring.

  • TheBlue22
    link
    fedilink
    English
    641 year ago

    Example #4363 why making everything “smart” is a terrible fucking idea

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    581 year ago

    Imagine having your smart cock cage locked out by Amazon because some rando told them you are racist lmao

  • Riskable
    link
    English
    511 year ago

    The researcher, who asked to remain anonymous because he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does, said he gained access to a database containing records of more than 10,000 users,

    10,000 users‽

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does

      Don’t mix your pen testing with your pen testing if you know what I mean.

  • roguetrick
    link
    fedilink
    491 year ago

    Isn’t this just facilitating their humiliation kink? I think it’s more of a service.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    471 year ago

    I’ll be honest, not the worst possible issue with a smart chastity cage that I could think of.

  • yukichigai
    link
    fedilink
    391 year ago

    This exact scenario has appeared in an entirely unsurprising number of chastity stories.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 year ago

    And to think I don’t even feel safe about buying something as innocent as a smart TV…

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The researcher, who asked to remain anonymous because he wanted to separate his professional life from the kink-related work he does, said he gained access to a database containing records of more than 10,000 users, thanks to two vulnerabilities.

    He also reached out to the company on June 17 alerting them of the issues in an attempt to get them to fix the vulnerabilities and protect their users’ data, according to a screenshot of the email he sent and shared with TechCrunch.

    [REDACTED] has left the site wide open, allowing any script kiddie to grab any and all customer information.

    “Your cock is mine now,” the hacker told one of the victims, according to a researcher who discovered the hacking campaign at the time.

    In 2016, researchers found a bug in a Bluetooth-powered “panty buster,” which allowed anyone to control the sex toy remotely over the internet.

    In 2017, a smart sex toy maker agreed to settle a lawsuit filed by two women who alleged the company spied on them by collecting and recording “highly intimate and sensitive data” of its users.


    The original article contains 702 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 74%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • JackFrostNCola
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    I feel like like the potential for being exposed as a chastity cage user might actually be a plus for some users

  • Extras
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    God i hope the users used a email alias and fake names