fossilesque@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours agoWhy Mark Zuckerberg wants to redefine open source so badlywww.zdnet.comexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1273arrow-down17
arrow-up1266arrow-down1external-linkWhy Mark Zuckerberg wants to redefine open source so badlywww.zdnet.comfossilesque@mander.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 hours agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squaredilroopgill@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·11 hours agoNo open source license type where corporations still have to pay?
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-23 minutes agoNo, because that would no longer be open in the open source sense. It’s either open for everyone, or it isn’t open. Edit: sorry to whoever doesn’t like it, but it’s literally how “open source” is defined
No open source license type where corporations still have to pay?
No, because that would no longer be open in the open source sense.
It’s either open for everyone, or it isn’t open.
Edit: sorry to whoever doesn’t like it, but it’s literally how “open source” is defined