• Kompressor @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Maybe if we change the angle like “WE’RE TAKING THE SUN’S ENERGY AND THERE’S NOTHING IT CAN DO ABOUT IT” if we’'re being mean to the sun maybe they’ll like it better.

    • pornpornporn@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Rebranding “let’s stop using oil to save the planet” into “let’s stop using oil because fuck those arabs” might convince some conservatives

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    They don’t like nuclear either. Too green. You only need a little drilling and everyone can do it.

    They only like things they can regularly drill or mine for so it’s tied to owning special land.

    Anyone can set up nuclear, solar, and wind power. They’re not getting rich off those.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I used to challenge conservatives on their nationalism and patriotism whenever it came to infrastructure and renewable energy. The idea was they should get behind efforts to beat, say, China at building rail and ports. We should be the standard bearer for solar, wind, and nuclear!

    Turns out they aren’t patriots and they’re bad at nationalism. They’re just lazy and racist.

  • slingstone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Yeah, I experience a bit of cognitive dissonance whenever I remember conservatism and conservation have very little overlap.

      • Zink
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        14 hours ago

        In conservation, you want to protect and restore the natural world.

        In conservatism, you want to protect and restore the social hierarchy.

        Seems to fit?

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Nuclear is popular on the left not the right so that name wouldn’t work

    The reason we don’t have more nuclear is because the right needed to keep their coal plants

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    19 hours ago

    If you’re falling to the myth of being a strong independent … person …. Pulling yourself up by your own bootstraps, solar and wind are local energy sources without foreign dependencies, and scale both up and down. This should be right up their ally.

    I don’t want to be on the Texas electrical grid because of all their blackouts: Deisel generators are noisy and I have to depend on someone to fill the tanks, but I can put solar on my roof and batteries on the side of the garage and be independent. Zero fuel costs. zero have to depend on anyone. —— why isn’t this their line?

    • Zink
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Texas conservatives making rational decisions based on real properties of the physical world?

      At least Texas can still give us great comedians too!

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I work in municipal development and permitting.

      Texas has had a HUGE surge in solar panel and backup generator installation over the past 4 years.

      But the power companies have taken notice. The biggest part of a lot of power bills now isn’t usage, but fees for being connected to the grid at all. And connection to the grid is required for a Certificate of Occupancy if you’re in a city, and to get insurance or a mortgage even if you’re in the county where permits aren’t required.

      You can’t even create a legal lot in Texas without having electrical service to the lot.

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’m not sure if there is a word for fundamentalist in the context of economics the way there is for religion. What ever it is that is the answer to:

      —— why isn’t this their line?

      A fundamentalist needs certain axioms and won’t come back to check if they line up with reality. This makes it nessesary for certain things to just be false no matter what.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Because it is change and visibility they are concerned with. Not the things they claim.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Supporters likes kickback from oil subsidies, fossil fuel deregulation, and supression of competitive technology. That’s the angle.

    …Maybe solar/wind companies should name themselves things like “Exon”

  • _____@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 days ago

    wind and solar are not popular for conservatives because they were left talking points first. which obviously means it’s wrong, libtards owned yet again

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Their biggest problem is that there’s not big money in them. Once you have solar power on your house, you don’t need to keep paying them every month. Where’s the fun in that for the rich?

    • hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you go far enough right, solar and wind are extremely popular. Very much leads to some weirdness when I was researching solar for my house, and kept stumbling into prepper communities and the like.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    The “right” aren’t right though, they’re wrong. They should be called “far-wrong” instead of “far-right”, imo, as their stances on many things show.

  • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    2 days ago

    To be fair, wind is also a form of solar power. (Wind being caused by the difference in heat between the different hemispheres/poles & the rotation of the earth)

    So wind & solar power are indirect & direct long-range nuclear energy sources, respectively.

        • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          2 days ago

          That comes from the energy from earth’s rotation. That energy is left over from the formation of the sun.

              • the_tab_key@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                15 hours ago

                Erm, the sun was formed in the center of a nebula and the planets formed out of the remaining mass that didn’t collapse into the sun. Yes, the gravity of the sun influenced how the remaining mass interacted and formed into planets with rotation, but it is not wholly a direct result of the sun itself, rather the angular momentum of the original nebula.

              • Cataphract@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                lol this is so pedantic it’s mindbogglingly fun. I would argue you’re confusing “gravitational effects” with what people are describing as “the sun’s output from nuclear fusion”.

          • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            Plus nuclear wouldn’t work without fissionable elements, which wouldn’t be here without supernovae aka dying suns.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 hours ago

              So nuclear power is not like solar at all…… it’s GALACTIC POWER! maybe COSMIC POWER!

            • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 day ago

              Which is why we need to finally develop fusion, to free us from the tyranny of power of stellar origin!

              …if you ignore the fact that fusion is basically replicating what a star does, that is

              • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                20 hours ago

                “Watch and dispair, oh mighty stars, how we have enslaved your children to release us from your tyranny!”

  • Ricky Rigatoni 🇺🇸@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Tell them that they need to stop using wind and solar or else in 100 yesrs we’ll run out of wind and sunshine. We’re talking about “adults” who have the toddler mentality of “DON’T TELL ME NO 😡”.