• Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Weird that this only goes back to 2011. I’ve been seeing it going back to microcodes printed by each color printer/copier in the 1980s, and it really goes all the way back to tight control of religious texts by the Egyptian and Israeli priests. Some might even argue that it’s pre-written text, as shamans had exclusive control of a lot of technologies including the creation of petroglyphs and pictographs, as well as the formation of pharmaceutical and psychedelic drugs.

    And that’s only in the West and the New World; the East has a long standing tradition of limiting technological freedom as well.

    As for current issues, the most insidious seems to be a combination of technological monoculture (which is different from interoperability) and abuse of dark patterns to get people to use freedom limiting “features” that are against their own best interests.

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ”Note: the dates of past events are only approximate. The other half of the timeline is wildly speculative and hypothetical

    Watch how many people are going to treat this shit as if it’s absolutely happening.

  • jarfil@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    2023: Google rolls out Web Environment Integrity checks into Chrome

    It hasn’t. WEI is only a proposal draft, for now.

    • Inductor@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It has allready been implemented in Chromium/Chrome (link). Websites only have to start using it.

      Edit: see comment

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That commit doesn’t implement WEI; it adds some development tests for the hypothetical API, and actually adds a feature to prevent the API from even getting enabled for testing.

        Websites can’t start using it, because it isn’t there.

        • Inductor@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ahh, sorry my mistake. I remembered reading a headline somewhere about Google having already implemented it, but I didn’t check. Thanks!

  • lowleveldata
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Implying Google can follow through their plan for more than 3 years.

    • IronTwo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t know man. Onion is not convenient, and in the modern day and age, especially online, convenience is king.

      Edit: I’m dumb, misread you comment as “in the future”, not “in my future”.