• RandomVideos
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If you want windows to disappear, you could throw rocks at them until they become too annoying to replace

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    24 hours ago

    IDC if Windows disappears, I just don’t want to see Linux turn into it.

    • Turret3857@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The open source nature kind of prevents that. Other projects have been made an example of like OwnCloud -> NextCloud, Emby -> Jellyfin, and I’m sure there are more I just can’t think of ATM.

        • Turret3857@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I mean, what are you referencing specifically because Android is still an open source operating system with healthy forks (Lineage, Calyx, Graphene, Muerena, PixelOS etc.) and ChromiumOS is open source I believe, even if its just a fork of Gentoo. Is there something I’m unaware of?

          • lemmus@szmer.info
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Well android is a mess because of google services, I haven’t tried grapheneos though…My experience with android is that I have even less control than over windoze

            • Turret3857@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              53 minutes ago

              G Services were never a part of android though, and android is fully functional without them if youre running a FOSS suite of apps. There are multiple options to restore GService functionality while maintaining privacy such as MicroG which is a reverse engineering of GServives to make them FOSS, and Sandboxed GServices which is literally just gservices, sandboxed, which will provide 1:1 compatibility with all your apps provided youre fine with having google code on your device.

              In terms of “control” on Android, it really depends on what you mean. On Android you can still uninstall every app you want provided you have access to ADB, unlike Windows where you can’t uninstall the damn built in web browser. Android also makes a lot of privacy features easier to access such as the ability to immediately turn off your location/camera/mic on the fly if you add them to your notification shade, as well as the Android 12+ feature of the “privacy bubble” that shows you if any running app is currently using location, camera or mic. There are definitely things Windows is “better” at, such as tweaking the UI/UX, but in all fairness if M$ could disallow that without breaking their legacy codebase they would.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    That’s why I never understood the Apple hate. Granted, it’s overpriced for the experienced user and closed-source software, but it’s a far cry from Microsoft’s hold on the market.

    We share a kernel for crying out loud. We’re practically cousins. Lol

    • IMALlama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      This probably isn’t a popular option, but a lot of the recent hate on Microsoft have been standard practice for Apple for a long time.

      Windows 10 free update length? 10 years. Mac? 5-7 years.

      Baked in cloud backup? Yeah, Apple has been doing that for a while and a lot of things go to the cloud by default. If you have an iPhone or iPad, things you download go to iCloud by default.

      It seems like Microsoft is trying to follow Apple’s model.

      I do get not wanting to support windows 10 anymore. The CPU limitations on Win 11 are very dumb, but it’s something Apple has been doing for decades. I will be installing mint on my old desktop.

      I give them less grace with OneDrive. That rollout has been very naggy and shitty.

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      macOS is a derivative of BSD Unix. Linux was a from-scratch Unix-alike. The fundamental core, including the literal kernel, are different even if they act the same in many ways.

      If you’re using “kernel” in a non-standard sense to mean “share some common tools, mindset and behaviour” then maybe, but that’s stretching the definition a long way from what technical people would expect.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Apple is what Microsoft wishes it could be (minus the difference in market share). That’s personally why I won’t give Apple any of my money. Really not interested in that locked down ecosystem.

    • admin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Both being POSIX compatible doesn’t make them related, is just a standard way of deploying portable operating systems from the early days.