In three weeks, Donald Trump has imploded whatever positive image the United States might have had internationally.

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The Roman Empire fell because of a series of invasions by “barbarian tribes.”

    I cannot take this author seriously after they wrote this. It was, you know, just a little more complicated than that.

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I don’t think the author meant that seriously. You see the quote around “barbarian tribes”? I think he considered this notion sarcastically, as this is “barbarian tribes” is often used by people less knowledgeble abou the topic.

      And for the US to implode within a few weeks, there must have been considerable rot inside. I am really not sure where precisely it started, but I consider Bretton Woods (both the system and it’s breakdown), Nixon with the final breakdown of honor in politics, Reagan and his “trickle-down economy” lie Reageanomics, and Bush Junior with his Gulf War key milestones in that process. Notice a trend? They were all Republicans. That Trump puts the final nail into the US’ coffin is only consequential.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Isn’t it crazy for Nixon to be a point of honor? Recent presidents have gotten away with a lot worse, but there is no resignation in dishonor, there are no consequences, nobody cares any more

        This is actually a big part of what keeps pushing me farther left. The party of righteousness, fairness, strict legal enforcement, strictly adhering to the constitution, was always dishonest but they’ve completely dropped any pretenses in favor of outright criminality, corruption, throwing out the constitution, enriching their corporate benefactors. They no longer even pretend that oppression is about family values anymore or that we will be trickled upon

      • skibidi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        73
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s a rather complex topic, but the short answer isn’t barbarian invasion.

        The simplest correct answer is the Roman elite became less interest in preserving the Roman state and more interested in increasing their own personal wealth and influence.

        • Carl@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          What’s wild is that “being Roman” persisted a lot longer than the tax system and patronage networks that had collapsed. It wasn’t until a large portion of the people who thought of themselves as “Roman” were invaded by the Eastern Roman Empire that the Roman identity was broken up, to be replaced by the regional identities that people rallied around to defend themselves.

          I feel like if the ERE’s leaders had taken a different approach, they could have stitched the Western Empire back together, but they broke it.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            That’s potentially a global problem. It’s not specific to the US as long as we keep making ourselves an attractive destination for immigrants and keep welcoming them ………… crap

          • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            define “enough kids” for me please.

            do you mean enough kids that their parents can’t feed them off their own little farm, and the kids had to be sent to the cities as slave / poor workers, so that the machines can keep churning for the sake of profit?

            edit: sorry but i’m pissed and angry now. “not enough kids” like what? not enough kids to make sausage of them? not enough kids to burn them in the kettle of capitalism? not enough kids to flood the labor market with undervalued workers?

            i tell you what, it’s capitalist propaganda that “people should have more kids”, because they think it makes the wages fall. what it actually does is create poverty, mass unemployment, working poor, and civil unrest. may the empire be intoxicated by its own poison. may the corporations fall due to the civil unrest that they helped create.

            • rabber@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Like the birth rate was too low overall.

              Of course more people makes wages fall. That’s why immigration is so popular in western world.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        It all started with the reform known as the Pax Romana. Rome stopped waging wars that kept the influx of slaves, which were fundamental for their economic model. They didn’t realize the implications of such a decision and didn’t design a viable alternative in time.

        • Snowclone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 days ago

          it took 100 or so years to really collapse and effective organization and leadership were big factors in that process. They didn’t lose a war and poof, everything was over, they were always fighting several other civilizations for dominance, they started consistently losing when the soldiers started showing up in rags.