• curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Because most people can’t identify one and use it for any mid size dog.

    See: Rottweiler, doberman in previous years.

    Edit: that includes cops. Same thing applies to police reports. Guess what insurance adjustors use as part of determining insurance rates?

    That isn’t the slam dunk of info you think it is.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      No one said it was a slam dunk? If you won’t accept statistics by non-profit organizations trying to provide people with knowledge, facts, and legal info… What would convince you that any one breed of dog is more dangerous than others?

      • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        As it does in many other areas, the controversial nature of the discussion poisons the well on sources supporting either view. The days of ‘here’s a study saying…’ being a useful tactic in anything are kind of dead. Most discussions can have reliable-sounding sources to support contradictory points. It gets hard to find the truth about anything without engaging in in-depth meta-analysis, let alone in a place like a comments section under a webcomic.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        That is a very poor argument. Non-profit organizations lie about their statistics and their so-called facts all the time.

        PETA is non-profit. Autism Speaks is non-profit. Anti-vax groups are non-profit. All sorts of groups dedicated to promoting authoritarian regimes are non-profit. And they all push a lot of bullshit that they claim to be facts and statistics.

      • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        What would convince you that any one breed of dog is more dangerous than others?

        Pretty much nothing since that isn’t how it works.

        There are some breeds that require more knowledge, experience, and time to handle properly. That includes the various breeds colloquially referred to as pitbulls, as well as German shephards, mastiffs, huskies, etc. I’d say most breeds with a job need knowledge and attention.

        But the “danger” part is an issue with the owner (or previous owner). The only foster dogs I’ve ever been concerned about have been abused, whether by ignoring them, not feeding them, physically abusing them, or otherwise.

        I can say I have a not insignificant amount of experience with quite a few breeds, and I can also say that blaming a breed is nonsensical.

        And the only dog in my home right now is a corgi.

        Edit: You’re clearly interested only in your opinion and not the reality of dog behavior. So I won’t bother further engaging with you, enjoy your day. I will simply note that health organizations such as the CDC note these same issues with statistics, and firmly recommend against breed-specific legislation for a reason. That, of course, may change under HHS Brainworms, but the actual data is quite clear.