• latenightnoir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This was my thought as well, goes to show we need better long-range public transportation!

    And bikes should be used for more granular destination points, once the bulk is covered via whatever works best as public transport in a given area.

    • Krik@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      we need better long-range public transportation!

      That’s what trains are for.

      What you actually need is a different city design. Office and housing need to be within 2-3 miles not 20-30, then bikes, buses and stuff become reasonable alternative modes of transportation. Even buying groceries could be done without a car.

      But the US of A chose to move housing out of the cities into suburbs dozens of miles away. As long as you don’t change that you’ll stay car-dependent. It’s just too far.

      It will also help to build more apartments that are cheap to rent. That increased concentration of people will make it possible for small local markets, restaurants, etc. to survive. Cost of living should also go down a bit because you’ll reach more people with less infrastructure. That’ll also increase tax revenue for the city. It’s win-win for everyone.