Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • self@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    Ā·
    2 days ago

    I stumbled upon this poster while trying to figure out what linux distro normal people are using these days, and thereā€™s something about their particular brand of confident incorrectness. please enjoy the posts of someone whoā€™s either a relatively finely tuned impolite disagreement bot or a human very carefully emulating one:

    • weirdly extremely into everything red hat
    • outrageously bad takes, repeated frequently in all the Linux beginner subs, never called out because ā€œhey fucker I know youā€™re bullshitting and no I donā€™t have to explain myselfā€ gets punished by the mods of those subs
    • very quickly carries conversation into nested subthreads where the downvotes canā€™t get them
    • accuses other posters of using AI to generate the posts they disagree with
    • when called out for sounding like AI, explains that they use it ā€œonly to translateā€
    • just the perfect embodiment of a fucking terrible linux guy, I swear this is where the microsoft research money goes
    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      Ā·
      1 day ago

      as in, distro for normal people? (for arbitrary value of normal, that is) distrowatch ranks mint #1, and i also use it because iā€™m lazy and while i could use something else, It Just Worksā„¢

      • self@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        Ā·
        1 day ago

        thatā€™s the one I ended up grabbing, and from the setup-only usage Iā€™ve been giving it, itā€™s surprisingly good

        • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          Ā·
          1 day ago

          iā€™ve installed it for my 70+ grandparents, they had no problems with it at all for a couple of years. (granted they just read news on it) iā€™ve used it on a two laptops for a 10y+ now and outside of typical linux problems that require minor configuring (bluetooth and wifi driver related mostly) it all works since day one, batteries included. for a couple of years timeshift is bundled in ootb so even if you fuck up there are backups

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      thereā€™s a post where they claim that secure boot is worthless on linux (other than fedora of course) and itā€™s not because secure boot itself is worthless but because someone can just put malware in your .bashrc and, like, chefā€™s kiss

      • bitofhope@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        Ā·
        2 days ago

        Theyā€™re really fond of copypasta:

        The issue with Arch isnā€™t the installation, but rather system maintenance. Users are expected to handle system upgrades, manage the underlying software stack, configure MAC (Mandatory Access Control), write profiles for it, set up kernel module blacklists, and more. Failing to do this results in a less secure operating system.
        The Arch installation process does not automatically set up security features, and tools like Pacman lack the comprehensive system maintenance capabilities found in package managers like DNF or APT, which means youā€™ll still need to intervene manually. Updates go beyond just stability and package version upgrades. When software that came pre-installed with the base OS reaches end-of-life (EOL) and no longer receives security fixes, Pacman canā€™t helpā€”youā€™ll need to intervene manually. In contrast, DNF and APT can automatically update or replace underlying software components as needed. For example, DNF in Fedora handles transitions like moving from PulseAudio to PipeWire, which can enhance security and usability. In contrast, pacman requires users to manually implement such changes. This means you need to stay updated with the latest software developments and adjust your system as needed.

        • self@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          Ā·
          1 day ago

          itā€™s beautiful how you can pick out any sentence in that quote and chase down an entire fractal of wrongness

          • ā€œUsers are expected to handle system upgradesā€ nope, pacman does that automatically (though sometimes itā€™ll fuck your initramfs because arch is a joy)
          • ā€œmanage the underlying software stackā€ ??? thatā€™s all pacman does
          • ā€œconfigure MAC (Mandatory Access Control), write profiles for itā€ AppArmor clearly isnā€™t good enough cause red hat (sploosh) uses selinux
          • ā€œset up kernel module blacklists, and more. Failing to do this results in a less secure operating system.ā€ maybe Iā€™m showing my ass on this one but I donā€™t think Iā€™ve ever blacklisted a kernel module for security. usually itā€™s a hacky way to select which driver you want for your device (hello nvidia), stop a buggy device from taking down the system (hello again nvidia! and also like a hundred vendors making shit hardware that barely works on windows, much less linux), and passthru devices that are precious about their init order to qemu (nvidia again? what the fuck)

          and bonus wrongness:

          For example, DNF in Fedora handles transitions like moving from PulseAudio to PipeWire, which can enhance security and usability.

          i fucking love when a distro upgrade breaks audio in all my applications cause red hat suddenly, after over a decade of being utterly nasty about it, got anxious about how much pulseaudio fucking sucks

          • bitofhope@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            Ā·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            My favorite bit:

            When software that came pre-installed with the base OS reaches end-of-life (EOL) and no longer receives security fixes, Pacman canā€™t help

            What base OS? The base metapackage that pulls in a small core of system software packages that are then treated and updated like any other package? What the hell is an EOL? You mean the thing that happens to non-rolling release distros such as Not Fucking Arch?

            When GNU Scrotum 5.x series becomes unsupported after release 5.56, people running Arch Linux will be happy to know they already have gnu-scrotum-7.62.69-rc1 installed from their repositories. Itā€™s the people on LTS Enterprise distros who have to start whining at their maintainers to backport a major version of GNU Scrotum released since the Obama administration.

            • self@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              Ā·
              20 hours ago

              youā€™re fucking right! my brain recombined that into a still wrong but slightly more sane claim when I first read it: ā€œwhat if the packages you installed lose all their maintainers?ā€ and, like, I think the only package manager that sometimes solves for that is Nix, and it solves it in the most annoying way possible (removal from nixpkgs and your config breaks, instead of any attempt at using an incredibly powerful software archival tool for intentionally archiving software (and it pisses me off that nixpkgs could trivially be the archive.org of packaging and it just isnā€™t, cause thatā€™s not a murder drone))

              but no, something about arch being relatively manually configured broke that posterā€™s brain into thinking that arch of all things didnā€™t have basic package management functionality, somehow. arch, the linux for former BSD kids too exhausted to deal with compatibility. nah, only red hat knows about, uh, basic software maintenance

            • bitofhope@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              Ā·
              24 hours ago

              I paid for the whole motherboard, Iā€™m using the whole motherboard thank you very much. ASCII was good enough for the Bible, so itā€™s good enough for me. God included character number 7 for a reason, even if that reason was for me to hear obnoxious buzzing from my audiophile grade piezo beeper.

              • froztbyte@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                Ā·
                13 hours ago

                [tgp-janice.bel]

                ā€œhi, please excuse me for the interruption. I want to know if youā€™ve heard of our lord and saviour, Quiet Electronics?ā€