jsomae@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 24 hours agoWhat do you believe that most people of your political creed don't?message-squaremessage-square376fedilinkarrow-up1102arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up196arrow-down1message-squareWhat do you believe that most people of your political creed don't?jsomae@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 24 hours agomessage-square376fedilinkfile-text
Just wanted to prove that political diversity ain’t dead. Remember, don’t downvote for disagreements.
minus-squarejsomae@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·5 hours agoNo proof is absolutely undeniable. Especially not in an age when generative AI will soon be able to fabricate evidence easily.
minus-squareHemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·5 hours agoYou are absolutely correct regarding AI. I hadn’t considered that. It gives me something to think about. Thanks!
minus-squaredaniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·4 hours agoDNA based proofs are pretty undeniable unless you have a twin.
minus-squarejsomae@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·4 hours agoIt’s not necessarily true. I mean you could be framed with your DNA. I’m not arguing that it’s plausible, just not absolutely undeniable. For instance, I would bet dollars to donuts that somebody has tried to frame someone else using their DNA.
No proof is absolutely undeniable. Especially not in an age when generative AI will soon be able to fabricate evidence easily.
You are absolutely correct regarding AI. I hadn’t considered that. It gives me something to think about. Thanks!
DNA based proofs are pretty undeniable unless you have a twin.
It’s not necessarily true. I mean you could be framed with your DNA. I’m not arguing that it’s plausible, just not absolutely undeniable. For instance, I would bet dollars to donuts that somebody has tried to frame someone else using their DNA.
deleted by creator