“The real benchmark is: the world growing at 10 percent,” he added. “Suddenly productivity goes up and the economy is growing at a faster rate. When that happens, we’ll be fine as an industry.”

Needless to say, we haven’t seen anything like that yet. OpenAI’s top AI agent — the tech that people like OpenAI CEO Sam Altman say is poised to upend the economy — still moves at a snail’s pace and requires constant supervision.

  • Mak'@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Very bold move, in a tech climate in which CEOs declare generative AI to be the answer to everything, and in which shareholders expect line to go up faster…

    I half expect to next read an article about his ouster.

    • enkers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      My theory is it’s only a matter of time until the firing sprees generate enough backlog of actual work that isn’t being realised by the minor productivity gains from AI until the investors start asking hard questions.

      Maybe this is the start of the bubble bursting.

      • Mak'@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’ve basically given up hope of the bubble ever bursting, as the market lives in La La Land, where no amount of bad decision-making seems to make a dent in the momentum of “line must go up”.

        Would it be cool for negative feedback to step in and correct the death spiral? Absolutely. But, I advise folks to not start holding their breath so soon…