• Zink
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I remember thinking highly of some of his early content. Like this guy could be a decent educator.

      Now every time I see him, he just comes across as a walking breathing brand rather than an interesting individual.

      • iamdefinitelyoverthirteen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        35 minutes ago

        This is completely unfounded and I have zero facts to back this up, but he comes off as creepy with kids. It’s just a hunch, but if I had kids, I would not let them near the man.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I generally prefer it if YouTubers can self-fund based on merch, as opposed to hawking shavers, VPNs, and overpriced TV dinners. That said, the drop in quality has been noticeable from that point on. The drone defense video was particularly noticeable for being military propaganda.

    • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Mark Rober lost me with his porch pirate booby traps.

      First of all, booby traps are illegal for a reason. Second of all, a lot of it was staged and it was pretty obvious.

      • Liquidthex@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Every single video he’s made, even the early ones, had an uncomfortable level of editing to them for me.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Booby traps are illegal if there is an intent to do harm. Something like this, or rigging your sprinklers to turn on when someone steps on your lawn wouldn’t be.

        • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          If you intentionally turn on your sprinklers as a deterrent, and it does damage to a person or property, you’d be liable for that.

          What if someone had important papers that you ruined. Or you broke their non-waterproof phone? What if someone was stepping off the sidewalk to let a wheelchair pass and you just doused them and the person in the wheelchair?

          What if your automated sprinkler starts spraying the EMTs or Firefighters coming to help you cause you fell in your bathroom and can’t get up? What if it shorts out the Lifepack they were going to use to check your heart and deliver an AED shock, and now someone died?

          Automated booby traps are always bad because you can’t judge the intent of the person, or animal, that might trigger it.