• bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The drone strikes thing is a bad example. If he didn’t touch it, individual combat units could use drones with impunity. He required drone strikes to be approved by his office.

    Tell me if you had the choice between sending in boots to kill a guy, or drone strike, would you really ever risk your guys getting shot?

    He added red tape, the minimum thing he could do. I’ll agree with criticism that he did the bare minimum, but all these comments about this frame it like he was horny for drones. That’s reductive and misleading.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Your comment is exactly the point I was trying to make. The world is complex and imperfect, so anyone with the power/responsibility of a president is going to do controversial things.