• Bzdalderon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    il y a 4 heures

    This actually makes sense. The problem though, will be the same reason fact checkers failed; personal and institutional bias on what’s considered acceptable.

    Only an unbiased AI could do this well, and that’s a loose statement.

    • dermanus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      il y a 3 heures

      I don’t think there’s such a thing as an unbiased AI. They’re all biased based on the input data.

      Something like this would be inherently subjective, it’s not a pure data question with a clear yes or no.

      • CptBread@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        il y a 2 heures

        Machine learning and LLMs isn’t the only way to do AI though. (though your second point I do kinda agree with)