I spent a few days comparing various Hypervisors under the same workload and on the same hardware. This is a very specific workload and results might be different when testing oher workloads.

I wanted to share it here, because many of us run very modest Hardware and getting the most out of it is probably something others are interested in, too. I wanted to share it also because maybe someone finds a flaw in the configurations I ran, which might boost things up.

If you do not want to go to the post / read all of that, the very quick summary is, that XCP-ng was the quickest and KVM the slowest. There is also a summary at the bottom of the post with some graphs if that interests you. For everyone else who reads the whole post, I hope it gives some useful insights for your self-hosting endeavours.

  • turnip@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    What do you use NFS for, isn’t NFS relatively obsolete by now?

    Assume I know not much about file shares.

    • node815@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      NFS4 I don’t think its obsolete.

      I use it for my Desktop computers to connect to the server. All of my systems use Linux so that’s my primary use. They backup to the server nightly.