It would tie in better with the email analogy, and it could show that they all just provide access to the same network.

What do you think?

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh god no. That’s like “I chose Burger King as my McDonald’s provider.”

    • SmokeInFog@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not really. In that metaphor it’s more like, “I chose the McDonald’s down at the corner to get my Big Mac instead of the one across town.”

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        “I can get a Whopper from McDonald’s and I don’t have to see any crap from Papa John’s because McDonalds is defederated from them.”

        Provider doesn’t make any sense when the content is coming from other places.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Fine, “I choose Burger King as my hamburger provider but I expect to be able to access a Big Mac from Burger King unless they are defederated.”

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah it’s even worse than that.

        fedia.io is a specific “provider” in this context. fedia.io runs on mbin. Lemmy is analogous to mbin. Many “providers” run on lemmy: lemmy.world, lemmy.dbzer0.com, lemmy.wtf, etc.

        What is being provided is fediverse access. “Fediverse” is not my mostest favorite term, but it’s the one that’s most accurate.

        • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          What is being provided is fediverse access. “Fediverse” is not my mostest favorite term, but it’s the one that’s most accurate.

          There’s a discussion on [email protected] about a name for Lemmy/Mbin/Piefed, as they are actually compatible. Mastodon and the others always feels a bit finicky. Feel free to contribute.

    • boydster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I mean, it’s not like that at all, but it’s ok to not care for it still. Lemmy is a federated platform, just like Pixelfed is, and Mastodon, etc. Those would be the providers in the example from before.

      Edit to add: Literally every time the word “instance” comes up in the manner noted above, it’s woth regard to a Lemmy instance, or a Mastodon instance, and rarely if ever have I noticed a reference to a “fediverse instance”. I have no clue where your comparison comes from.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Lemmy is a server application. Mastodon is a server application. Pixelfed is a server application.

        I don’t use Lemmy. Never have. And yet here I am.