Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • self@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    Ā·
    9 days ago

    To be clear, this is not a rant against securityā€¦ I treat security of my devices seriously.

    exactly! and taking this shit seriously is why this overbearing shit sucks, especially when itā€™s theater or enforced for threats that arenā€™t realistic for your threat model. unlike some of these fuckers, we both actually intend to daily the devices weā€™re locking down.

    because apparently having non-smooth scrolling can be fingerprinted (that being possible is IMO reason alone to burn down the modern web altogether)

    oh I fucking hate this. itā€™s the same shit as forcing dark mode off/on as part of fingerprinting protection. not only is this the absolute wrong way to fix that shit, itā€™s pretty monstrous for anyone who needs dark mode or light mode to use their device in anything resembling comfort ā€” your user may have a visual impairment or severe light sensitivity, and now theyā€™re fucked cause the developers couldnā€™t accept a minor fingerprinting risk (and light/dark mode and smooth scrolling are both utterly minor, to be real)

    Possibly controversial, but Iā€™ll say it: web browsers being so annoying about self-signed certificates.

    motherfucker yes! the CA infrastructure is nowhere near usable for all cases and we all know it, but locking down the web and making development and self-hosting fucking annoying is the game for the browser vendors and Google in particular. to add to this: why the fuck is my browser acting like me not having a cert for localhost is a tragedy? why does the browser sandbox not allow certain shit unless Iā€™m using https of all things to access localhost? where precisely is the fucking threat here? (Iā€™m sure some well-paid security asshole at one of the browser vendors could snark a list of unlikely shit as reasons why local host needs to be treated as insecure with no toggle or dev tools option to treat it otherwiseā€¦ and I just donā€™t give a fuck)

    The entire reality of secure boot on most platforms

    Iā€™d love good secure boot! the one on PCs ainā€™t it at all, and unfortunately the secure ones tend to be used to lock out device owners from modifying what they own and implement shit like attestation thatā€™s just there to violate your rights and make sure youā€™re not blocking ads, so unfortunately good secure boot might be incompatible with capitalism. for now though at least graphene seems to benefit from a secure secure boot chain that hasnā€™t been locked down yet?