Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    Ā·
    7 days ago

    In other news, BlueSkyā€™s put out a proposal on letting users declare how their data gets used, and BlueSky post announcing this got some pretty hefty backlash - not for the proposal itself, but for the mere suggestion that their posts were scraped by AI. Given this is the same site which tore HuggingFace a new one and went nuclear on ROOST, Iā€™m not shocked.

    Additionally, Molly Whiteā€™s put out her thoughts on AIā€™s impact on the commons, and recommended building legal frameworks to enforce fair compensation from AI systems which make use of the commons.

    Personally, I feel that building any kind of legal framework is not going to happen - AI corpsā€™ raison dā€™etre is to strip-mine the commons and exploit them in as unfair a manner as possible, and are entirely willing to tear apart any and all protection (whether technological or legal) to make that happen.

    As a matter of fact, Brian Merchantā€™s put out a piece about OpenAI and Googleā€™s assault on copyright as I was writing this.

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      7 days ago

      ā€¦eh, fuck it, hereā€™s my sidenote on Brianā€™s piece:

      Google and OpenAIā€™s campaign gives me the suspicion that the ongoing copyright lawsuits may be what finally pops this bubble. Large Language Models are built though large-scale copyright infringement, and built to facilitate large-scale copyright infringement - if the actions of OpenAI and pals are ruled not to be fair use, it would be open season on LLMs.