• ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Let’s not whitewash their history. A lot of concessions they only gave up due to legal challenges, and then there’s the whole child gambling thing.

    • kitnaht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      “Valve Child Gambling” brings up nothing. Care to enlighten me? As well as hand-wavey “a lot of concessions”…care to elaborate?

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Their refund policies only came about because different governments sued them. Check out either coffeezilla or People Make Games on CS:GO loot boxes, the latter of which has interviews with plenty of the victims of this system that Valve allows to continue because it’s so lucrative for them.

        • Firipu@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I’ll give you the csgo gambling. That is fucked up.

          But their refund policy is best in class. I don’t care how they got there, it’s better than shops give me for actual physical games…

          I’d love to see what you consider an alternative better storefront.

          • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            I was specifically refuting, “They’re the only ones safeguarding the industry,” and how they got to their refund policies matters when it comes to that statement. I was not here to throw a gauntlet down, insult Steam’s honor, and challenge anyone to a duel. I prefer to shop on GOG these days, when possible, but my Steam profile says I have 991 games in my account, and I bought most of those. Valve and Steam have done lasting, measurable good to this industry and medium, but that doesn’t mean they’re safeguarding it or that it’s all good news. As to the thing about ads, I don’t think that model would actually work with the PC gaming audience, and I think Valve prohibiting it is just so that their audience still finds quality products on Steam and spends more money. Valve’s best behaviors and worst behaviors are motivated by profit.

            • kitnaht@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Valve’s best behaviors and worst behaviors are motivated by profit.

              That’s where I disagree. Valve is not a publicly traded company. It is not beholden to shareholders to strive for profit above all else, and it shows in Valve’s leadership.

              • dustyData@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                Just because they are private doesn’t mean Gabe doesn’t like to make a ton of money. Dude owns tons of yacths and would like to own more. I love Valve and think they are the biggest ethical company in gaming. But they’re still a massive corporate monopoly. No one is perfect, and they did do things that hurt people. No need to be publicly traded to also be evil. Trust but verify.

              • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Striving for profit is a quality tied to being a company, not being a publicly traded company. Everything they do is in pursuit of making more money. Often times, that means making the best store out there so that we shop with them instead of their competitors, which is how it’s supposed to work.

                • kitnaht@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 minutes ago

                  Everything they do is in pursuit of making more money.

                  That’s where I’m saying you are wrong.

                  Publicly traded companies are beholden to their shareholders, and MUST strive to make money above all else. Privately held companies can put that profit motive behind other more important motives. Sure, does Valve want to make money? Absolutely - we’ve all got to make a living.

                  But is that their ONLY goal at the expense of everything else? Also, clearly not - or we’d have ads on every steam store page, we’d be paying monthly for steam, and you’ve seen all the shady, shitty things that all the other wanna-be steam competitors have done. So clearly valve does not value profit above everything.