I heard a lot of bad stuff about Brave and their CEO lately and am now unsure if the search engine is any good? Do they censor stuff? Is any data collected? Can it be considered private?

If you’d not recommend it, what are good alternatives and why? I was a long time duckduckgo user before, so anything similar to it or brave search would be great. I’m not into self hosting.

  • glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    trustworthy

    They are recommended on privacy guides: https://www.privacyguides.org/en/search-engines/#brave-search I generally trust privacy guides, although I don’t use Brave Search.

    CEO

    Their CEO is anti-vax and homophobic. Brave Browser (not search) has had some controversy around including crypto, replacing ads with their own, and having had inserted affiliate links into the URL bar in the past.

    censor stuff

    Hard to say, the job of a search engine is to show you what you want to find.

    data collection

    There is telemetry that can be turned off.

  • raptir@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It may help to understand what problem you are trying to solve by moving away from DDG.

    • hertg@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have also been using it for a while now, it’s the best alternative I tried so far. downsides are cost, closed-source, and my fear that they’re gonna take VC money in the future. So far, I can stand behind their offering tho. And the built-in feature to lower or raise results from certain pages is amazing.

    • utopia_dig@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been using Kagi for a few months now. Before that I used Brave Search. With Brave search I had to use the g! bang every few searches. Now with Kagi I have maybe used it five times in total. It has so much better search results!

    • Linus_Torvalds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here. The devs are super responsive to the community and actually care about privacy. The heated discussion on whether to include a suicide warning with certain searches is a banger read.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Brave is one of the more privacy-centric search engines. I don’t think it is the best on privacy, but it is pretty good.

      • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Source is the same level of reliability as brave saying it is trustworthy.

        The source is “trust me bro”

        Which means: no, it is not trustworthy. Hence my “no”

    • odium
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      How is that different from other public searxng instances?

      • §ɦṛɛɗɗịɛ ßịⱺ𝔩ⱺɠịᵴŧ@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It could just be me, but I dig disroots outlook. They’re a privacy-focused platform ran by volunteers in it for what seems to be all the right reasons. While on the other hand, I can’t tell you much about the other public SearXNG instance options.

  • asmodeus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can use brave search anonymously through 4get.ca if you don’t trust them.

  • miah@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ive been enjoying the results I get through qwant.com searches; its not perfect but feels more like older Google (before enshittification)

    • Dsklnsadog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Thanks for the suggestion. I’m using startpage.com and I’m kind of trying to leave the Google influence but not at the cost of efficency.

      I hate so far the results provided by brave, ddg, and ecosia.

      But this one… It looks promising.

      • owlinsight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I stopped using Startpage because they regularly limits service access to IPs reserved for VPNs or Tor and it was immensely annoying having to prove that I’m a human each time I searched for anything.

        Have you also heard of SearXNG?

        I’d be also curious to know what annoyed you about DDG or Brave search.

        • Dsklnsadog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, I’m familiar with SearXNG, but every time I tried searching for something complex on different instances, I would encounter the following error: “Sorry! we didn’t find any results. Please use another query or search in more categories.” I genuinely appreciate what they’re trying to accomplish with that project, but I’m not in a position to test something if it doesn’t demonstrate the same efficiency as a established product. Let’s say I can’t afford to be a beta tester right now.

          To a lesser extent, I had a similar experience with Brave, as its results align more with what I expect from Google (and therefore, StartPage).

          DuckDuckGo, when I tried using it as an alternative, never provided me with better results than what StartPage offered. I’d love for it to work for me, but I simply end up spending more time there than on other search engines.

          • BuckShot@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            A trick I’ve learned for when this happens with SearXNG is to add “!web” to the search query. It provides a wider range of search engines and images, which specific ones can be selected in the settings. Like all things software, it takes a bit to adjust to a new interface but SearXNG allows users to control a lot more of the functionality.

  • trippingonthewire@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Brave is alright for normies and maybe as a secondary browser.

    I’d try a SearX instance or SearX.be and use FireFox or Librewolf as a browser, at least as a primary way to look things up.

  • Gamey@feddit.rocks
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a really good search engine and I have no reason to doubt their claims about privacy and cencorship but I have to say no there because beside finding piratebay in the normal search results it’s all just their claims and I don’t know of any sientific study or similar that ever tested any of the claims. If you don’t trust those promises self hosting SearX is probably a good option and I haven’t tried it in years but Qwant is another one with their own index aka independent results.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use a lot of search engines, none of these are Google, Bing or Brave. I use mainly Andisearch as primary search and Mojeek as second (both are between the most privacy protecting search engines out there). Apart some others (Qwant, DDG, Startpage, MetaGer, and some specific ones for news, images, resources, Url Checks, etc. and interns from social networks)