employers

are any good?

      • my_hat_stinks
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sounds like corporate jargon. Why not just say worker, a term everyone understands?

          • my_hat_stinks
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            IC is a common term for integrated circuits and a hundred other things.

            Maybe it’s used for workers in your specific region/field but that’s not definitely universal and it’s not even a useful or descriptive term. Managers are also individuals who ostensibly contribute something to the company. The distinction between managers and workers is that the workers are the people doing the actual work, not that they’re individuals.

            • Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              No acronym is universal.

              You can overload acronyms with dozens of different meanings.

              But still, IC is common as individual contributor. Case in point: Microsoft uses it as a filter on their career site. Not exactly a small company…

              • my_hat_stinks
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                And it’s differentiated from IC meaning Independent Contractor by…?

                No, corporate jargon is stupid and saying it’s acceptable because a big corp uses corporate jargon is even stupider.