Tea to

Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days ago

US appeals court says AI authors don't qualify for copyright.

go.theregister.com

cross-posted to:
[email protected]

286

US appeals court says AI authors don't qualify for copyright.

go.theregister.com

Tea to

Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days ago

cross-posted to:
[email protected]

US appeals court says AI authors don't qualify for copyright

go.theregister.com

: Computer scientist Stephen Thaler again told his 'Creativity Machine' can't earn a ©

Computer scientist Stephen Thaler again told his ‘Creativity Machine’ can’t earn a ©

Chat

gimmelemmy@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
3
arrow-down
2·
2 days ago
So, if i rip off an AI author, I will only owe royalties to the author the AI ripped off?

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

3.66K users / day
12K users / week
21K users / month
36K users / 6 months
986 local subscribers
67K subscribers
14.3K Posts
578K Comments
Modlog