Data on search engine market share is available, but I wonder what that looks like for Lemmy users in particular, who I would assume lean more technical than the average user, so probably use DuckDuckGo and alternates more than Google.

I use a mix of DuckDuckGo and Kagi. I’ll also use ChatGPT, which can be good if you’re careful to verify the answers it gives you as a check against hallucinations. It’s useful for short, direct answers without ads or SEO bullshit.

This article on Ars (and if you’re not a subscriber, you absolutely should be, as they are the best tech journalists out there) inspired the question: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/06/google-admits-reddit-protests-make-it-harder-to-find-helpful-search-results

Fucking Reddit. Enshittification ruins everything.

  • Kir@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t understand why lots of you answer with chatGPT. It’s not a search engine! And you shouldn’t use it like a search engine.

    • NeonWoofGenesis@kek.henlo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can see a usecase for where you don’t know where to start or search with, and then verify with actual searches.

      I recently used it to explain for a friend what is the difference between wheat and ale beer, and it gave a very good summary. With DDG I might not get a direct explanation and would need to read a few articles and then word them in a comprehensive way.

    • coldredlight@beehaw.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you pay there’s an option for chatgpt4 that can use Bing to search. There’s also various plugins that can let it interact with all sorts of additional data sources. Not that you should use it like a search engine exactly, but it can be useful for search if you configure it correctly and understand that it doesn’t “know” anything.

      • fera@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bing has gpt 4 for free, there’s a button for it on bing.com. I do pay for GPT Plus but there’s no web search option there for me, I have to use bing for that.

      • Kir@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No it’s not. To search is a specific task, and generative AI can’t do that. It can fulfill some need that we are used to fulfill by searching the web, but this doesn’t mean it’s a search engine.

        If you lost the key of your car and have access to an AI that can (sometimes) start your can without a key, you can be happy about it, but you still can’t say the AI searched the key for you. It can’t do it.

        Edit: btw, we are talking about generative AI here. I’m not saying there isn’t and could not be a search engine that use AI to better its result.

          • Kir@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why do you have to answer like that?

            You are linking a search engine based on generative AI, which is a different things than using chatgpt per sè and, as I was saying to another user, I did not know existed.

            If you don’t like my answer you can simply not comment on that. I don’t care if you agree with me or not, be polite

            • newde@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Don’t worry, you are in the right: a LLM is not a search engine. You might integrate it into a search engine, but that doesn’t make it a search engine.

              I mean it’s so glaringly obvious it is not a search engine: every time you ask ChatGPT for information it will give you a disclaimer it’s database is from 2021 and prior…

    • 雨 月@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe people mainly search for answers to simple daily life questions or something.

      • Kir@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I guess, but it’s still not a search engine and I think it’s a bit problematic if that’s the usecase.

    • Ix9@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here. I know a lot of folks don’t like the results, but to be honest, I don’t find Google any better these days.

  • eight_byte@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Kagi. Very happy with it. Best $5 it recently invested. Gives me much better results than Google and all the others.

    • monotrox@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do you come by with just 300 searches per month? I tested the trial period and used up the 100 searches in just a couple of days

      • eight_byte@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, that limited number of included searches is my only criticism I have with Kagi. They are aware of this, and are trying to offer customers more searches for the same price by improving their costs. I am glad they decided to do this by reducing their costs and have decided to not go the road of monetizing their users by selling ads and customer data.

        However, I try to use Kagi only for serious search requests. For other very trivial searches, I use Startpage. For me, works OK. But I hope that one day Kagi offers enough searches, so I can just use it everywhere as my default search engine without having to thinking about it.

          • eight_byte@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            With trivial search requests, I mean stuff like entering the name of a company as a search term, where you could have easily just entered the direct URL in our browser instead. There is almost no benefit for using Kagi on this. Almost every search engine will give you the result you are looking for as the first search result.

  • ian@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    https://www.marginalia.nu/

    Currently down for updates, but does a great job of avoiding SEO abuse/blog spam/etc. Takes you back to the earlier days of the internet when it felt like there were more forums/individual sites/etc. They’re still out there, just hidden under all the junk.

  • I Cast Fist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use mostly either ddg or brave search. I miss the google of pre 2010, when the majority of its results were good.

    I also use Yandex whenever I’m looking for pirate stuff, the only engine that doesn’t block those kinds of results.

  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Self-hosted Searxng. It’s shared to multiple people which kills a lot of the usefulness in Google or others trying to track my instance.

    • copylefty@lemmy.fosshost.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I tried this, but it kept saying ‘Engine failed’ or something on every other search. I never could figure out why. I might try again

      Edit: Actually it was Searx I used. I’ll spin up Searxng and see if it’s improved

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had some issues with searx… Things are a bit better in my experience with searxng. Sometimes I still run into the error messages. But usually it’s my fault more than anything (server bogged down, too many requests/searches across all my users, or internet blips)… I just rerun the search a few seconds later and it’s usually good again.

  • kscutsforth@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Duck Duck Go is the only search engine I use. Switched away from Google for privacy reasons and haven’t missed it a bit.

  • sorchist@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using DuckDuckGo since, at least 2010, maybe earlier. If its results aren’t up to snuff, I’m not aware of that because they’re what I’m used to. I fall through to Google ( !g) if I think there might be more out there. The bang commands are so good. I use DDG as my main search in my search bar and then I can use the bang commands to get to whatever specialized search I want from there. It’s a meta-search-engine.

  • chri_ho@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am a long time DuckDuckGo user. I came for privacy and stayed because of the features.

    • Nankeru@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Kagi, hands down, is by far the best search engine I’ve ever used (next to Neeva, which got bought and shut down) without looking for Reddit results all the time.

      Just simple searches like “Best gaming headphones” or “Realtek Driver Download” and comparing them with Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Brave, Startpage, etc. shows how the quality of the results are far superior.

      And you can directly define, which sites you’d like to see higher / more results of or less - or even completely block or pin them to the top.

      Also, it also shows you directly, before visiting a site, in colors if a site has a very high number of ads and/or trackers.

      And they support for power users custom CSS to adjust everything, URL rewrites (e.g. change all Reddit URLs to old.reddit or to automatically open libreddit or archive.org versions), DDG and custom bangs, and much more.

      Lastly, I created a so-called “Lens”, which allows me to search Lemmy / Kbin content only (also still have one for Reddit).
      Meaning with one click, it shows me results from only sites or keywords I’ve defined - see image.

      Very satisfied with it, can only recommend.

      (copied from another thread I replied to)

      • aksdb@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        What plan are you on? Did you adjust your usage behavior to not waste search queries?

        • Nankeru@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Didn’t adjust my usage at all. I used the plan with 1000 searches, but since I work as an IT administrator and literally make searches everyday throughout the day multiple times, I changed to the ultimate plan.

          For normal (home / mobile) usage, 1000 searches are more than enough for 2 people.

    • SpacemanSpiff@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use Kagi too, it’s surprisingly snappy! Like seriously impressive for a small org. They talk about speed optimisation being critical for them as well. I find the result to be excellent as well. A true Google replacement/feels like Google in its prime.

      I believe they have their own index and bot as well?

    • 🇺🇦 Max UL@lemmy.pro
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      +1 for Kagi, seems a great value to me, well worth the price to not have any ads, no tracking (leap of faith here) and great search results.

  • acow
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are you using DDG in addition to Kagi because of Kagi’s limited number of searches per month, or because DDG does something better?

    I’m a bit conflicted about Kagi because $5/month is a plausible price, but the limited number of searches seems like it would add an extra step of, “Do I want to use my limited search resource on this search?” to every search, which is an unwanted extra bit of friction.

    • Leigh@beehaw.orgOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use DDG because I’m still not decided on whether or not Kagi is worth it. If there’s no significant difference in the results returned by DDG, why pay for Kagi?

    • Sev@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve been using Kagi for a couple weeks. I’ve so far found it to be excellent. One thing to note is it supports DDG-style bangs, and those don’t count against your search quota, so getting used to using them for wiki, youtube, IMDB, etc., is worth it. I also bumped up to the $10 plan, just to wash out any second-guessing on searches, although the price even if you exceed your quota is pretty cheap, and it seems like most people probably do far fewer searches than I do.

      I still find DDG to be pretty terrible, but I have very occasionally fallen back to google, mainly for specifically searches for businesses / services near me, that kind of thing, or for searches for very recent things - somebody had posted a screenshot of an article on IIRC Fortune Magazine’s site. I wanted to read it, and it turned out the article was only a few hours old at that time. Google had it indexed, but Kagi didn’t yet.

      For more general searches and technical searches I do for work, though, it’s been very very good, and those are the most important searches, to me.

  • Link.wav [he/him]@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m still looking for a search engine that doesn’t use data from my IP address to provide targeted results. In the meantime, I’ve gone back and forth between using SearXNG instances and using Startpage, but there’s really not a decent search engine in existence, from what I can tell.

  • lentilhoarder@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Thanks for making me aware of Kagi, I’ve been trialing it and getting decent results is a breath of fresh air in a world of blogspam and LLM garbage.

  • JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been using Ecosia for a while and liking it. I think the results are usually better than Google and the image search is way more useful, still gives you direct links to the image files. Though most importantly I like planting trees.