• blargerer
    link
    fedilink
    19710 months ago

    Almost like torture is a really good tool for getting people to talk, and a very bad tool for getting them to tell the truth.

    • PugJesus
      link
      fedilink
      6910 months ago

      Turns out torturers are just really lonely and want someone to talk to

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1610 months ago

      Torture’s ‘appropriate’ use case is to ask multiple people questions and then compare the results to find commonalities. Torturing one person is essentially useless.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 months ago

      You should watch The Torture Report with Adam Driver. It’s a very good examination of how torture programs start and then continue due to a need to prove they were justified in the first place.

    • @charolastra
      link
      English
      2010 months ago

      Or a happy meal toy for adults

  • style99
    link
    fedilink
    3210 months ago

    Elmo loves torture, and he’s a billionaire so it totally must work great!

    /s

  • qaz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3110 months ago

    As you know, when atoms are split, there are a lot of pluses and minuses released. Well, we’ve taken these and put them in a huge container and separated them from each other with a lead shield. When the box is dropped out of a plane, we melt the lead shield and the pluses and minuses come together. When that happens, it causes a tremendous bolt of lightning and all the atmosphere over a city is pushed back! Then when the atmosphere rolls back, it brings about a tremendous thunderclap, which knocks down everything beneath it.

    Looks legit to me

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1410 months ago

      I find it funny that the article says that he mistakenly describes an antimatter bomb, I mean how would he have known about an antimatter bomb?

      For someone who has no idea about nuclear fission, he did a great job at making something up. His imagination was credible enough to safe his life.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        “Mistakenly by coincidence”, in this case.

        What he really described was… a capacitor. Except for the lead part. And one that would melt itself. But whatever worked.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2010 months ago

    “I already told you I don’t know anything about any f*cking setup. You can torture me all you want.”

    “Torture you? That’s a good idea. I like that.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1210 months ago

    Japan would have fought until they all died regardless. The nukes gave the Emperor an excuse to override the military leaders and ordered them to surrender. This satisfied the Japanese code of “honour” because a God told them to commit a disgraceful act of surrender, not themselves. Even then, many still commited seppuku.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2010 months ago

      This is a pop culture myth. There was some resistance to the idea of unconditional surrender in the Japanese government (partly because of the emperor), but at the time the bombs were dropped, the Japanese leadership had agreed on surrender as their course of action and were attempting to strike a deal with the Soviet Union to mediate the terms on their behalf.