Claims being made: Operation Matthew 4:19
-
AFTER the start of New Year 2014, AFTER the November 2013 meetings and December 2013 trolling operation announcement: to wage war against Ukraine
-
The Matthew 4:19 trolling operation planned in 2013 would not end, as was published in 2014 “The underlying aim, Surkov says, is not to win the war, but to use the conflict to create a constant state of destabilized perception, in order to manage and control.”
Operation Matthew 4:19 was initiated in March 2013 even before November 2013 meeting.
-
The World Wide social media trolling operation was launched on the Web in early 2013 but not reported in Western news sources until middle of year 2014
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.” ― Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark, 1995
Duplicating this message on root thread start / tree root.
So much for media illiteracy, huh.
More mocking. “Mock mock mockery” information warfare that is saturating society in year 2024 and year 2025. https://mastodon.social/tags/MockMockMockery
So much for media illiteracy, huh.
Your entire reply is only “English literacy”, I said you have “media ecology literacy”. these are two very different things.
In response to your misunderstanding of what I meant, I created a new Lemmy community [email protected]
It does not mean gender as in gender roles or gender identity specifically,
“Media Ecology” literacy is not “English prose literacy”
It does not mean gender as in gender roles or gender identity specifically,
The whole context of the posting is the repeat emphasis on timing. “November 2013”, “December 2013”, “Ukraine War start” (February 2014, after the New Years, typical in businessmen word)… and “Internet Research Agency” going online in 2013 even BEFORE the “November 2013” meeting.
That’s the CORE concept of the posting emphasis. Time, how events were lined up like bowling pins by Putin’s Kremlin. They (“Internet Research Agency”) was already attacking ALL people via World Wide Web with Cambridge Analytica + Vlad Surkov behavior patterns and proving their systems BEFORE Donald Trump even went to Moscow in November, and before Putin announced a month later in December.
Context: Timing of year 2013, the months of 2013, and start of Ukraine war 2014
Go BEYOND the context of a single 2013 article and list above to VALIDATE how Russia and other conservatives have been behaving since that meeting.
-
The ruling is the latest step in a decade-long crackdown on LGBTQ+ rights in Russia under President Vladimir Putin, who has emphasized “traditional family values” during his 24 years in power. - November 2023. EMPHASIS: “a decade-long crackdown” - which means year 2013. See how there is evidence that 2013 was a big turning point in “cracking down” on it in Russia?
-
“in 2014, President Obama signed Executive Order 13672, adding “gender identity” to the categories protected against discrimination in hiring in the federal civilian workforce and both “gender identity” and “sexual orientation” to the categories protected against discrimination” <<<<< in RESPONSE to this March 2013 onward IRA attacks on WWW, and the November 2013 Moscow sex show, and the December 2013 announcement by Russia, the United States Government took actions to RESIST Putin’s Kremlin.
I suggest you study more about both media ecology [email protected] and information warfare, the “Internet Research Agency” history and [email protected]
Reddit isn’t, reddit does /u/Username not @ like Twitter.
Same principle for each. You use prefix + username. Seriously, dude, sometimes you gotta jump the gaps yourself to have a functional conversation.
Same principle for each. You use prefix + username.
Unlike “old Reddit” it is interactive Javascript, it requires more than that. third time seems the charm.
You haven’t responded? I’m waiting. Here is the comment: https://lemm.ee/post/60089834/19353142
You have to localize that link.
You haven’t responded? I’m waiting.
I absolutely did. What you on about, Willys?
Same principle for each. You use prefix + username.
What does “prefix” mean? username? hostname?
Here is my attempt: https://lemm.ee/post/60089834/19353102
What does “prefix” mean? username? hostname?
A user prefix is an arbitrary character or series of characters that go before a username. A hostname is a name given to a device on a network. Hope that helps.
A hostname is a name given to a device on a network. Hope that helps.
I was not asking what a hostname was
Repeating: What does “prefix” mean? username? hostname?
This is two independent questions in series:
- what does “prefix” mean, a “username”?
- what does “prefix” mean, a “hostname”?
…
Example:
@RoundSparrow@lemm.eeUsername prefix:
Username:RoundSparrow
Hostname prefix:
Hostname:lemm.eeI already got your new message and replied.
Yes, as you keep showing evidence of with each reply.
I said, do you know how the words “genderless and neutered” modify liberalism in that quote? Remind me again what your answer was, please. That’s right, you don’t have a good answer because you f’d up.
Remind me again what your answer was, please.
So much for media illiteracy, huh.
More mocking. “Mock mock mockery” information warfare that is saturating society in year 2024 and year 2025. https://mastodon.social/tags/MockMockMockery
So much for media illiteracy, huh.
Your entire reply is only “English literacy”, I said you have “media ecology literacy”. these are two very different things.
In response to your misunderstanding of what I meant, I created a new Lemmy community [email protected]
It does not mean gender as in gender roles or gender identity specifically,
“Media Ecology” literacy is not “English prose literacy”
It does not mean gender as in gender roles or gender identity specifically,
The whole context of the posting is the repeat emphasis on timing. “November 2013”, “December 2013”, “Ukraine War start” (February 2014, after the New Years, typical in businessmen word)… and “Internet Research Agency” going online in 2013 even BEFORE the “November 2013” meeting.
That’s the CORE concept of the posting emphasis. Time, how events were lined up like bowling pins by Putin’s Kremlin. They (“Internet Research Agency”) was already attacking ALL people via World Wide Web with Cambridge Analytica + Vlad Surkov behavior patterns and proving their systems BEFORE Donald Trump even went to Moscow in November, and before Putin announced a month later in December.
Context: Timing of year 2013, the months of 2013, and start of Ukraine war 2014
Go BEYOND the context of a single 2013 article and list above to VALIDATE how Russia and other conservatives have been behaving since that meeting.
-
The ruling is the latest step in a decade-long crackdown on LGBTQ+ rights in Russia under President Vladimir Putin, who has emphasized “traditional family values” during his 24 years in power. - November 2023. EMPHASIS: “a decade-long crackdown” - which means year 2013. See how there is evidence that 2013 was a big turning point in “cracking down” on it in Russia?
-
“in 2014, President Obama signed Executive Order 13672, adding “gender identity” to the categories protected against discrimination in hiring in the federal civilian workforce and both “gender identity” and “sexual orientation” to the categories protected against discrimination” <<<<< in RESPONSE to this March 2013 onward IRA attacks on WWW, and the November 2013 Moscow sex show, and the December 2013 announcement by Russia, the United States Government took actions to RESIST Putin’s Kremlin.
I suggest you study more about both media ecology [email protected] and information warfare, the “Internet Research Agency” history and [email protected]
-
-
they were going to troll the entire world (over gender)
Where do you find that? None of the articles you linked mention gender and yet the claim seems to pivot this whole thread.
Also, I can’t find anything about Operation Matthew 4:19 anywhere. Not in the articles you linked or through DDG. Did you come up with it?
Again, I’ll repeat
You sure have. Gj 👏
Skin color, white, orange, brown, black, yellow. Superficial and banal.
Pfft, did that really go over your head? If I say “you don’t resemble the champion of goodness even in hair color” what do you think I’m saying? Honest question.
Did you come up with it?
Yes.
None of the articles you linked mention gender and yet the claim seems to pivot this whole thread.
The top list, number 2 on the top list says: “one month later announced in December 2013 that they were going to troll the entire world (over gender)”
the linked article: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/12/vladimir-putin-conservative-icon/282572/
At the top the 2013 article says: “The Kremlin leader’s full-throated defense of Russia’s “traditional values” and his derision of the West’s “genderless and infertile” liberalism”
Later in the article it says: “The speech came on the heels of the appointment of Dmitry Kiselyov—the television anchor who has said the hearts of gays and lesbians who die should be buried or burned—as head of the new Kremlin-run media conglomerate Rossia Segodnya.”
Yeah, I read the whole thing and all of the other articles in full but I don’t see what you see. “Gays & lesbians” is about sexual orientation and not (trans)gender. Mind you, I know bigoted politicians are willfully stupid in this regard, but still, the articles barely mention gender at all the way both the title and the body of the post make it seem. I went in looking for that specifically but didn’t find much of anything.
I don’t mean to say the links aren’t good or that the gender wedge issue isn’t playing a part–they are–but your synthesis feels off. Idk, maybe I’m missing some more context?
“genderless and infertile”
that’s year 2013 speak of a government official for anything not producing children. A man who transgenders to a female can’t birth a child, infertile.
It’s about freedom, the freedom of individual people to choose to dress how they want. Conservatives do not want people to have the freedom to have sex the way they choose, but instead follow rules and laws. (Laws the whole world generally agrees on is age of consent, not allowing sex with children age 8, beyond that, there are lot of groups like the Taliban in Afghanistan who want to outlaw sex outside marriage, etc)
I suggest you look on your own for Russia’s history and “conservatives” across the world on the topic.
“for over a decade”
Which puts us back to these year 2013 meetings and the December 2013 announcement I am drawing attention to as an origin of the world wide “Conservatives International 2013” announcement by Putin.
A man who transgenders to a female can’t birth a child, infertile.
That’s not true. None of this is about gender. What’s going on? lol
What’s going on? lol
What’s gong on? You doing LOL LOL LOL and amused with comments on serious topics. That’s what’s going on with Lemmy machines and your social communications devices.
“When a population becomes distracted by trivia, when cultural life is redefined as a perpetual round of entertainments, when serious public conversation becomes a form of baby-talk, when, in short, a people become an audience, and their public business a vaudeville act, then a nation finds itself at risk; culture-death is a clear possibility.” ― Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, 1985 [email protected]
None of this is about gender
The topic here surely is not pizza toppings and sports scores.
You are playing word games here? LOL LOL? Funny word games? What’s your name, what nation do you live in?
My name is Stephen Gutknecht. I live in the United States of America. I’m not here for LOL LOL "gender does not mean men and women and who should be in the kitchen and who can wear a dress or trousers/pants" or whatever game you think you are playing on Lemmy.
I see your Lemmy Profile says " Sorry not sorry " - you a insincere participant?
Clown Population. The clowns inside the White House are only a small fraction of a total society of mock for mock, reactionary mocking, clowns. The entire nation is a “basket case of clowning around” on social machines / HDTV media machines / mockery.
People like to play a game of psychological denial and say ONLY MAGA is the clowns, only the White House is the clowns. It’s the entire population of Untied States of America.
::: ________
Lemmy community description of [email protected] on sidebar: “Clown Population. The clowns inside the White House are only a small fraction of a total society of mock for mock, reactionary mocking, clowns. The entire nation is a “basket case of clowning around” on social machines / HDTV media machines / mockery. People like to play a game of psychological denial and say ONLY MAGA is the clowns, only the White House is the clowns. It’s the entire population of Untied States of America.”The topic here surely is not pizza toppings and sports scores.
Well, it’s not about gender, either. It’s about conservative values generally and gender was barely even mentioned.
You doing LOL LOL LOL and amused with comments on serious topics
You are playing word games here? LOL LOL? Funny word games?Excuse me? You’re the one editorializing. And now you’re mocking me and trying to make me seem unserious because you find common paralinguistic features annoying even though they are not the point? Are you trying to draw attention away from what I’m pointing out to you?
I see your Lemmy Profile says " Sorry not sorry " - you a insincere participant?
Huh??
E: You know, you don’t gather bees with vinegar. I literally read all the shit you posted. How many people here do you think would ever do that, much less with your attitude towards people being polite.
You know, you don’t gather bees with vinegar.
Everybody had since 1985 to “bee fly” over to Neil Postman and look around at what is happening in April 2025 on social media.
You can keep attacking the messenger, it’s not my fault that egomania is the outcome of the Russian information warfare.
You know, you don’t gather bees with vinegar.
It is not true. Donald Trump is toxic vinegar poison. And he attracts people every day to LOL LOL LOL and mock Donald Trump on Lemmy.
If TRUTH SINCERITY and HONESTY attracted people, why aren’t people discussing [email protected] Malala on Lemmy every day on the front page? You know what they are attracted to SHIT, the smell of Elon Musk’s every move and shake, every single move and antic of Donald Trump and MAGA participants. People in April 2025 on social media are in no way showing they are attracted to good things like Malala’s educations and teachings.
Are you trying to draw attention away from what I’m pointing out to you?
No, not at all. I told you what I think. You are clowning around on social machines, playing world games. that’s what people do, they think human beings being wrecked by billionaires is funny. Every day in year 2024 and year 2025, that’s what I see all over every social media platform. Comments of people amused at Elon Musk attacking his trans-gender daughter going LOL LOL on their Apple iPad / Apple iPhone / Android / WIndows devices. A population full of clowns on social machines who think saying “ELON MUSK DUMB STUPID IDIOT” over and over in comments and postings on computer networks is entertaining. Unable to describe how that mocking / mockery clowning by everyday people is a system of political control by the Russian government that has been exported since year 2013.
:::: __________
“Everything in our background has prepared us to know and resist a prison when the gates begin to close around us . . . But what if there are no cries of anguish to be heard? Who is prepared to take arms against a sea of amusements? To whom do we complain, and when, and in what tone of voice, when serious discourse dissolves into giggles? What is the antidote to a culture’s being drained by laughter?” ― Neil Postman, Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business, 1985 [email protected]
Archive . org copy of this posting: https://web.archive.org/web/20250331211605/https://lemmy.world/post/27627662
