I don’t care if it’s in a shitposting community, a meme community, or a news community. If the image or text is generated it should be labeled as such, and failing to label it should be grounds to remove the post. AI slop is a plague and its only going to get worse as the tech matures (if it hasn’t already peaked).

I’m so tired of having to call it out every time I see it, especially when people in the comments think it’s a photoshop work or (heavens help us) real. Human labor has real tangible value that plagiarism machines can’t even pretend to imitate and I’m sick of seeing that shit without it being labeled (so I can filter it out).

  • RandomVideos
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    If something that was made relatively effortlessly is possible to be confused with something made with effort, it should be marked

    I suggested banning AI from communities that arent made for AI because it requires so little effort and its so easy to mass-produce, that it could flood a community

      • RandomVideos
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Could it? I dont think you can mass produce photoshopped images and its much harder to pretend you put effort into something when you didnt (thats why i put relatively)

        Even if you could mass produce them and it was easier to fake effort, is anyone doing that? There are people doing those things with AI

        • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Photoshop is magnitudes of effort less than pre-photoshop technology. The amount of images you can churn out quickly with photoshop is certainly mass production when compared with what you can get done without photoshop, for much less effort.

          is anyone doing that? There are people doing those things with AI

          Is anyone photoshopping images? Hell yes. Do you think we just invented fake images?

          • RandomVideos
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            By “that”, i meant mass producing images and making it hard to tell if it was done the hard way or the easy way (while peoplw assuming it was done the hard way)

            People dont automatically assume a picture is made by AI the same way they would assume a picture is photoshopped if it was clearly faked

            A future where images are all assumed to be made with AI is hopefully obviously bad

            • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              By “that”, i meant mass producing images and making it hard to tell if it was done the hard way or the easy way (while peoplw assuming it was done the hard way)

              No, because the common sense assumption at this point is that everything is done with photoshop or similar technology.

              People dont automatically assume a picture is made by AI the same way they would assume a picture is photoshopped if it was clearly faked

              They will in a few years. We’ve been through this whole cycle, is my point. The technology is here to stay, and we’re gonna have to adapt to it. No amount of complaining will change it.

              A future where images are all assumed to be made with AI is hopefully obviously bad

              Why so?