I’ve been pretty busy in my life recently, but I finally got around writing this blog post. Hopefully, things are sorted out in my personal life and I should be able to be more regular about these updates in the future.

I’m very happy to see good progress towards rustup distribution (thanks to Kobzol again!).

  • BB_C
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    Oh, and clean all doesn’t work reliably. Since trying to build in release mode after building in debug mode then cleaning is weirdly broken.

    And It’s not clear from the README how to build in release mode without running test --release. And the fact that all combinations of --release-sysroot and --release --sysroot and --release --release-sysroot exist doesn’t help 😉

    • antoyoOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Thanks for reporting this! I cannot reproduce with the following:

      y prepare
      y build --release
      y build
      y clean all
      

      (it shows: Successfully ran clean all)

      Could you please provide the commands you ran to get this? (It might also be easier for me to track this if you open an issue on GitHub since I don’t come here often.)

      Also, thanks for the suggestion for better documentation: I created an issue for this.

      • BB_C
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Yeah, apologies for not communicating the issue clearly.

        cp config.example.toml config.toml
        ./y.sh prepare
        ./y.sh build --sysroot
        ./y.sh clean all
        # above commands finish with success
        # below, building succeeds, but it later fails with "error: failed to load source for dependency `rustc-std-workspace-alloc`
        ./y.sh test --release 
        

        And then trying to use the “release” build fails:

        % CHANNEL="release"  ./y.sh cargo build  --manifest-path tests/hello-world/Cargo.toml
        [BUILD] build system
            Finished `release` profile [optimized] target(s) in 0.03s
        Using `/tmp/rust/rustc_codegen_gcc/build/libgccjit/d6f5a708104a98199ac0f01a3b6b279a0f7c66d3` as path for libgccjit
           Compiling mylib v0.1.0 (/tmp/rust/rustc_codegen_gcc/tests/hello-world/mylib)
        error[E0463]: can't find crate for `std`
          |
          = note: the `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu` target may not be installed
          = help: consider downloading the target with `rustup target add x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu`
          = help: consider building the standard library from source with `cargo build -Zbuild-std`
        
        For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0463`.
        error: could not compile `mylib` (lib) due to 1 previous error
        

        I will make sure to report issues directly in the future, although from account(s) not connected to this username.

        • antoyoOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          The issue here is that you didn’t provide --build-sysroot to ./y.sh test --release, so it cannot find the std crate.

          • BB_C
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            But running

            ./y.sh prepare
            ./y.sh test --release
            

            does work. That’s what gave me the impression that clean all doesn’t actually clean everything!

            • antoyoOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              18 days ago

              It does actually clean everything. You need to call ./y.sh prepare again if you ran clean all; otherwise, it will fail to find some stuff like rustc-std-workspace-alloc.

              I opened an issue to improve the documentation in this regards. Thanks for testing all this: this will help me improve the documentation.

              • BB_C
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 days ago

                You need to call ./y.sh prepare again

                Aha! Good to know. And yes, improved documents would be of great help.

                Thanks again for working on this.