I do mean stuff like removed scenes from international airings, replacing objects like cigarettes or vine with any other objects.

  • flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I found mansplain on Merriam Webster, and also on Wikipedia. The Merriam Webster article says “of a man,” and the wikipedia article says “for a man” at the start.

    Usually for these things I’d be all for abolishing the gendered nature of the word, but I feel like it would dilute the original meaning. So if anything, instead of gender-normalizing ‘mansplain,’ I think we need to add ‘womansplain,’ which is something I’m very guilty of doing to my partner whenever he’s cooking because I keep forgetting that it’s something he does very well.

    But also, my reply still has merit here, because that individual was obviously weaponizing ‘mansplain’ to try and gender me, a woman, when what they likely wanted to convey was that they found me condescending. They shouldn’t be appropriating a gendered word to say something else they mean, so… uh. Sorry for all the extra words. I took my ADHD medication today and language discussion fascinates me.

    • guy@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      Great for you. But what its definition is and how it is used obviously differs, as you as a woman is mansplaining mansplaining 😄

    • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I do find you incredibly condescending. I do not believe that has anything to do with your gender, however you are being very condescending.

      Also I use mansplain regardless of gender. A lot of people do. I don’t know why this offends you. It sounds like you’re looking for something to be offended by (see, THAT is a condescending tone. See how that sounds? That’s what you do.)