That wording is pointing to reselling the program or the same functionality. Of course if your service is “fast key based data retrieval” it would violate the definition, but something like “low latency gaming notifications” would not, because the value is gaming notifications, something redis doesn’t offer. Same as if your service uses encryption in transit, you’re not just reselling openssl.
I know prohibiting reselling is what they probably intended. But that doesn’t mean they can’t push a different and very valid interpretation when they want to.
you’re not just reselling openssl.
The wording—“primarily derives from”—is much broader than “just”. I believe that Resque’s dependence on Redis is enough to satisfy “primarily”.
That wording is pointing to reselling the program or the same functionality. Of course if your service is “fast key based data retrieval” it would violate the definition, but something like “low latency gaming notifications” would not, because the value is gaming notifications, something redis doesn’t offer. Same as if your service uses encryption in transit, you’re not just reselling openssl.
I know prohibiting reselling is what they probably intended. But that doesn’t mean they can’t push a different and very valid interpretation when they want to.
The wording—“primarily derives from”—is much broader than “just”. I believe that Resque’s dependence on Redis is enough to satisfy “primarily”.
Well, I don’t believe so, but as you said it’s ultimately for a court to test it.