Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 24 天前Are you threatening me?slrpnk.netimagemessage-square140linkfedilinkarrow-up11.42Karrow-down125
arrow-up11.4Karrow-down1imageAre you threatening me?slrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 24 天前message-square140linkfedilink
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·23 天前 his debate skills are <6th grader, so he literally is Now that’s a logical fallacy.
minus-squareNOT_RICK@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·23 天前Literally is now just an intensifier in most contexts. We’ve lost the war
minus-squaremisteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-223 天前He literally might as well be in his capacity to debate and process emotions, which is his only relevant skills here. But the other way was shorter to write.
minus-squareMonkderVierte@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·23 天前What i meant was, bad at debating = dumb, that’s not how it works.
minus-squaremisteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·23 天前I think what I meant is, are there any important differences between him and a 12 year old in this context?
Now that’s a logical fallacy.
Literally is now just an intensifier in most contexts. We’ve lost the war
He literally might as well be in his capacity to debate and process emotions, which is his only relevant skills here. But the other way was shorter to write.
What i meant was, bad at debating = dumb, that’s not how it works.
I think what I meant is, are there any important differences between him and a 12 year old in this context?