• pulido@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    I believe it’s a chicken and an egg problem.

    If free software projects had more users, those users would improve the software further with donations, patches, and bug reports.

    • msage
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Wow, do I have some stories for you.

      But in short, there’s a lot of FOSS software that people use every day without knowing about it.

      And it gets no funding, because why it should.

      Companies making 9+ figures have issues sending even a $1000 to an open project that they depend heavily on.

      But Microsoft/Oracle/VMWare/Google licenses? That money just shoots out like from a cannon.

      Even if those products are not 100% needed and can be replaced.

    • somedev@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think both can be true. I just mean if we’re talking about a company paying for Microsoft Office vs LibreOffice.

    • PushButton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      No.

      There is enough LibreOffice users to realize that the curve of the donations over users isn’t proportional.

      When was the last time you donated?

      Exactly.