This is a question has been bothering me as someone who’s country was colonized by the British Empire. We were taught about it in schools and how it lost power over time but never how the USA came to take its place especially over such a short compared to the British Empire.

  • gibmiser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I am talking out my ass, but didn’t the UK basically overextend itself with its colonies and have to let them loose so it could focus on issues at home?

    • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      More that as independence movements grew, and the economy shifted to valuing high value manufactured goods colonies became more expensive to hold and less profitable.

      Combine that with the anti Nazi rhetoric, it made holding colonies militarily much harder to do. Especially as Britain, unlike France, has never really seen itself as a military force.

      We much prefer to control the seas and play off local groups against each other and help the preffered side to come out on top and work as a local ruling elite.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because the cost of two world wars broke the bank, and the US saw the opportunity to seize global hegemony.