I know this sounds bad, but maybe this is a blessing in disguise. Necessity is the mother of invention and maybe browser technology should be funded by governments instead of privately owned advertising megacorps?

  • namingthingsiseasy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Also, I’m not going to argue that things aren’t better for developers today than they were before. Sure, web development is much easier these days. But at the same time, I think web applications are way too overengineered. There are lots of things that could be done in simpler ways - for example, why is it necessary to restyle scrollbars, or reimplement standard components like drop-down menus with reimplementations written entirely in Javascript? Things like this are just stupid and having to drop support for trivial things like this in the name of making browsers simpler is well worth it in my opinion.

    • Kogasa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Dropping support for that stuff means breaking 95% of the websites people currently use. It’s a non-starter, it cannot ever happen, even if you think it would be for the best.

      • Maltese_Liquor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I remember a lot of similar arguments about how ubiquitous Flash was when mobile devices were first taking off. Not saying it will be easy or even likely not saying it will never happen is a bit of an assumption.

        • Kogasa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It’s a different situation, as a dev I’d happily bet my life on this assumption.