• Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Lol I’m not taking it literally, I’m taking it analytically. It’s entirely valid to dissect a metaphor and analyze what it means and why. An allegory is itself an argument - a way of using fictional elements to deliver non-fictional ideas. It’s normal to argue for or against the allegory as being a useful delivery system for those ideas.

      If it’s not a good metaphor… well, that’s exactly what the rest of us are talking about when we critique the Rogue/Storm thing. You are the only one in the room that doesn’t understand that we are all calling that a bad metaphor.

      We know the forest is there, we just think there’s a big stupid tree that is actually blocking our view.

      Edit - and for the record, I’m not critiquing the entire forest! The rest of the metaphor is pretty good. But those examples really do undercut their own delivery of the idea.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Storm’s comment was directed at Rogue. The one who was excited about a cure for her horrible condition that makes it so she can’t touch another human being without fucking them up. If literally anyone else had asked if it was true there was a cure then your point would make sense but Rogue actually does need the cure. It was shitty writing to have it be Rouge that got that lecture and people are right to call it out.