• Quilotoa@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    I lived in Haiti for 3 years where the top of a woman was not considered private. Within 2 months, looking at a woman’s breast was about as exciting as looking at her elbow. Weirdly, they switched back to being sexual after returning to Canada.

    • Sludgeyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is an incentive to cover them for women

      When they stop becoming “private parts” they stop having the effect

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            To be clear, I would expect that if it’s by culture, then it’d be very common to see women walking around topless and nobody pays it much attention.

            Lots of places allow it at a matter of law. There’s been many state Supreme Court cases like the one in OP that say female breasts don’t count towards indecent exposure. Where I live (Madison, WI), those laws only apply to being sexually lewd. Anyone can technically run around naked otherwise, but it’s not something people commonly do outside of the World Naked Bike Ride and protests.

        • overcooked_sap@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          At least in Ontario. Women have had the same right as men to go topless anywhere a man would. This is since 1996, I think that’s when that Gretchen lass took it to court.