Ya this is so convoluted and I feel like there are several jokes that are supposed to be obvious here. Usually the joke in this kind of stuff is the absurdity of the entire thing.
One. They are just cat suits. Also, I think the characters never appear before or since so there is no context that can help.
My best guess is that the “hetero” part is her providing makeup and costumes (including the mouse to be thrown up) while the “homo” part is the singing…
What I’m getting that is hetero girl-on-girl is somewhat performative and passive, instead of the hardcore fucking expected by the red-haired lesbian (hence “the lesbian”), as indicated by her response that she (the lesbian) would be doing all the work and her accepting the claim that the “straight” black-haired woman (hence “the straight”) will be doing makeup as her (the straight’s) hetero part of the hetero-homo sex-exchange.
The second half is the absurdist punchline in the execution. Movie-level cosmetics, including realistic amounts of hair – enough to create a hairball during unknown forms of oralplay, presumably provided by the straight. And a dogged insistence from the lesbian that dislodging a hairball not end the sexual encounter, which required continuous singing. Perhaps it was a sexual rendition of the musical “Cats”, further tying in existing stereotypes of queer people and their relation with/affinity to theater and the fine arts.
Hey everyone in the comments, you seem to be experts on the terminology
Care to explain this comic to me? Oglaf: Memory (NSFW)
Ya this is so convoluted and I feel like there are several jokes that are supposed to be obvious here. Usually the joke in this kind of stuff is the absurdity of the entire thing.
You’d be right. OGLAF tends to have several layers of joke, most of them vulgar and absurd.
Are these two comics, or one comic where they turn into cats halfway through
One. They are just cat suits. Also, I think the characters never appear before or since so there is no context that can help.
My best guess is that the “hetero” part is her providing makeup and costumes (including the mouse to be thrown up) while the “homo” part is the singing…
What I’m getting that is hetero girl-on-girl is somewhat performative and passive, instead of the hardcore fucking expected by the red-haired lesbian (hence “the lesbian”), as indicated by her response that she (the lesbian) would be doing all the work and her accepting the claim that the “straight” black-haired woman (hence “the straight”) will be doing makeup as her (the straight’s) hetero part of the hetero-homo sex-exchange. The second half is the absurdist punchline in the execution. Movie-level cosmetics, including realistic amounts of hair – enough to create a hairball during unknown forms of oralplay, presumably provided by the straight. And a dogged insistence from the lesbian that dislodging a hairball not end the sexual encounter, which required continuous singing. Perhaps it was a sexual rendition of the musical “Cats”, further tying in existing stereotypes of queer people and their relation with/affinity to theater and the fine arts.