• AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t disagree with your conclusion, but I think part of why it sucks now is all the Search Engine Optimization, of people trying to game Google into showing you their website, and only necessarily the one most pertinent to your search

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        There have been former Google employees saying they had solutions to deal with SEO, but they were vetoed by the ads side of business, since better results reduce “engagement”.

      • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s part of it. The other part is that Google, and other search engines, assume you’re clueless and try to “fix” your query for you, and you can’t stop it because they’ve been removing support for searching exact words or using boolean expressions or excluding words.

    • verstra
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      sus of them to drop the slogan “don’t be evil”

    • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      The thing is though, despite Google not being my primary search, shout-out SearXNG, it doesn’t suck now for me.

      If I’m looking for information, Google is great and the AI summaries provide everything I want.

      If I’m looking for a song or artist discography, Google again is great.

      It’s only when I’m looking for sites that I tend to not even bother with Google.

      • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve been running my own searxng instance for a while now. It is very good 99% of the time. Miles better than the garbage that google generally returns.

  • magnetichuman@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Number of search queries is such a bad metric for quality of your product. If your search is trash then the user is going to need more queries to get a satisfactory answer. That is, until they stop using your service of course.

    • megopie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      yah, that’s the point. They go for queries because each query, theoretically, means more ad views and more ad views means more money. So they made the search worse to increase query count.

      Like, this was intentional and understood internally. Not saying the people who actually carried it out liked what they were doing, but management said to make number go up, so they did.

      • magnetichuman@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I would hope that any competent person can see that this can not end well.

        Google must know that they are not a monopoly in search.

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Well AI is destroying search, one of the main points of AI is to design an architecture where ads and Not Bullshit can come together in an organic, inseparable union that regulators can’t figure out how to reasonably demand be artificially severed.

    The cardinal sin for Google with search engines is it is too obvious when something is a manipulated advertisement vs. actual search result and A.I. perfectly “solves” that problem.

    Google needs to be broken up.

  • Kualdir@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Switched to ecosia for private use and qwant for professional use. Much better than google and they’re creating their own search index now

      • Kualdir@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Too bad, I’d suggest Ecosia next or if that is not an option something like startpage

    • the16bitgamer
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s a few thing ecosia still gets wrong or offers the wrong answer. But 80% of the time it is correct.

      Using it on all my devices.

      • Kualdir@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I personally don’t really have any issues with that anymore. Used to be like that years ago but has improved massively. Mainly their image search thats a bit meh