Okay, so I was correct in my assessment that you mentioned it for completely inauthentic, point-serving reasons?
Is the creative process “damaged” because a baker doesn’t make chocolate chips from scratch for their cookies?
Yeah so, this is actually paying for premade assets, which is an established practice and what I am advocating for. It’s not comparable in any way to AI.
The metaphor you’re looking for is, “Is the creative process “damaged” because a baker doesn’t take photographs of their actual goods, and simply uses generic AI generated advertisements?” And the answer is yes, obviously the creative process has been damaged.
It is up to you and not a moral conundrum whether or not you care that you are eroding your creativity. But that is evidently what is happening, I’m sorry to say
You are very badly mistaken in your assessment of this conversation. In fact you’ll notice I have repeatedly excused you from any type of judgement. Look at how I’ve signed off my last comment; this is not a moral issue, merely a practice that has damaged you.
Alcohol is bad for you. In any amount. Ten drinks a day, one drink a week, no matter. You would be better off drinking zero alcohol. I offer this wisdom to you completely free of judgement
Do you believe the above is possible? Do you believe, having offered your opinion on why AI use is fine in your case, someone can offer the viewpoint that it is damaging without judgement?
You haven’t presented any “evidence” to disagree. You’ve made subjective declarations, treating them as facts. You may be interested to know this severely damages your intelligence. Not that I’m making a moral judgement, but you should acknowledge your damaged intelligence.
It’s obvious to any reader that this is a simple and complete misread, I’m sorry to say. The evidence has been laid out very plainly for you. Please feel free to consider this interaction more carefully in the future, without the burden of pride forcing some poorly constructed reply
As a random passer by, you look like someone with a damaged intelligence and inability to crawl out of your own dropping for the love of the smell.
Your evidence has been self serving, pointless and baseless offering nothing but opinions on someone else in a judgemental way.
Your every shared view this far has been from a place of false authority and having no weight behind it. Becoming defensive and attacking because from all appearance you view your self as being better then the person your talking to.
At the end of the day. You look, and sound like a pompous fool who doesn’t realize their own short comings and ignorance.
I notice that you are very similar to my discussion partner here in your complete inability to address the topic. Perhaps you are kindred spirits. Indeed your phrasing and even your spelling errors are similar as well. Maybe you both suffer from an AI sickness we don’t yet fully understand
But yes, your cowardice has been noted, thank you. There’s a beautiful irony in signing off your diatribe about someone else’s superiority complex by proclaiming they are beneath your further consideration. You are well acquainted with the smell of those droppings yourself, it seems
Still, no evidence has been presented. Only your subjective opinions, presented self-righteously obvious fact. This is severely damaging to your intelligence. Acknowledge it, or acknowledge that a stranger’s opinion does not constitute “evidence” by any coherent definition.
Please feel free to consider this interaction more carefully in the future, without the burden of pride forcing some poorly constructed reply
This is excellent advice, I would recommend reflecting upon it.
Correct. You’ll find many such valuable little gems, going all the way back to the beginning of this conversation.
Anyway, we’re eight comments deep now into you deflecting and changing the subject. Normally I’d love to drill into the details with anyone about facts and the nature of subjectivity, but just like before, I detect you’re merely scrambling into this territory because of the way you think it sounds in this moment. And I detect that just like before, you would simply run away once we began closing in on the truth.
So, you could save us both some time and just run away now? Would be pretty graceful at this point too, after your grand realization that you find my ‘opinions’ to be irrelevant lol
Okay, so I was correct in my assessment that you mentioned it for completely inauthentic, point-serving reasons?
Yeah so, this is actually paying for premade assets, which is an established practice and what I am advocating for. It’s not comparable in any way to AI.
The metaphor you’re looking for is, “Is the creative process “damaged” because a baker doesn’t take photographs of their actual goods, and simply uses generic AI generated advertisements?” And the answer is yes, obviously the creative process has been damaged.
It is up to you and not a moral conundrum whether or not you care that you are eroding your creativity. But that is evidently what is happening, I’m sorry to say
We’ve certainly come a long way from “not judging or anything”
You are very badly mistaken in your assessment of this conversation. In fact you’ll notice I have repeatedly excused you from any type of judgement. Look at how I’ve signed off my last comment; this is not a moral issue, merely a practice that has damaged you.
Alcohol is bad for you. In any amount. Ten drinks a day, one drink a week, no matter. You would be better off drinking zero alcohol. I offer this wisdom to you completely free of judgement
Do you believe the above is possible? Do you believe, having offered your opinion on why AI use is fine in your case, someone can offer the viewpoint that it is damaging without judgement?
There are other forms of judgement than just moral. Subjective proclamations are one.
You are of course free to disagree with the evidence, thank you for your consideration
You haven’t presented any “evidence” to disagree. You’ve made subjective declarations, treating them as facts. You may be interested to know this severely damages your intelligence. Not that I’m making a moral judgement, but you should acknowledge your damaged intelligence.
It’s obvious to any reader that this is a simple and complete misread, I’m sorry to say. The evidence has been laid out very plainly for you. Please feel free to consider this interaction more carefully in the future, without the burden of pride forcing some poorly constructed reply
As a random passer by, you look like someone with a damaged intelligence and inability to crawl out of your own dropping for the love of the smell.
Your evidence has been self serving, pointless and baseless offering nothing but opinions on someone else in a judgemental way.
Your every shared view this far has been from a place of false authority and having no weight behind it. Becoming defensive and attacking because from all appearance you view your self as being better then the person your talking to.
At the end of the day. You look, and sound like a pompous fool who doesn’t realize their own short comings and ignorance.
-Note I do not check replies.
I notice that you are very similar to my discussion partner here in your complete inability to address the topic. Perhaps you are kindred spirits. Indeed your phrasing and even your spelling errors are similar as well. Maybe you both suffer from an AI sickness we don’t yet fully understand
But yes, your cowardice has been noted, thank you. There’s a beautiful irony in signing off your diatribe about someone else’s superiority complex by proclaiming they are beneath your further consideration. You are well acquainted with the smell of those droppings yourself, it seems
Still, no evidence has been presented. Only your subjective opinions, presented self-righteously obvious fact. This is severely damaging to your intelligence. Acknowledge it, or acknowledge that a stranger’s opinion does not constitute “evidence” by any coherent definition.
This is excellent advice, I would recommend reflecting upon it.
Correct. You’ll find many such valuable little gems, going all the way back to the beginning of this conversation.
Anyway, we’re eight comments deep now into you deflecting and changing the subject. Normally I’d love to drill into the details with anyone about facts and the nature of subjectivity, but just like before, I detect you’re merely scrambling into this territory because of the way you think it sounds in this moment. And I detect that just like before, you would simply run away once we began closing in on the truth.
So, you could save us both some time and just run away now? Would be pretty graceful at this point too, after your grand realization that you find my ‘opinions’ to be irrelevant lol