LegoGPT generates a LEGO structure from a user-provided text prompt in an end-to-end manner. Notably, our generated LEGO structure is physically stable and buildable.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is how AI should be used. this idea of throwing everything at it but the kitchen sink is a big mistake. The most successful things will come out of training to do something specific on the highest quality data they can get. Less bad data percent will win over total data amount.

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’re just built with 1 by X bricks. But I kinda like that, it’s not replacing anything a person would design. I think I’d prefer a program that would take a 3d model as in input instead of a text prompt, but both are cool.

  • rmic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s awesome in one hand, but on the other it removes a lot of the frenzy creativity fun

    • MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I don’t know for sure, but right now we’re in a very early version of an AGI with limitations, but it’s only available to users who pay a subscription.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nobody can tell you, and if they say they do know, they’re selling snake oil.

      But when it happens, shit is going to change fast, for better or for worse.

    • 0x01@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Tool use/mcp can do an awful lot already, not everything but it’s hard to come up with stuff it just plain can’t do.

      Agi is poorly defined, without a clear definition of exactly what it is there will never be a time we actually achieve it because the goalposts will move.

      We all probably remember the time that the turing test was the ultimate test of an ai, but that’s pretty well cooked and it no longer matters at all.

      • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        AGI has always had a same definition: general intelligence, when an AI can do anything a human brain could.

        • Bio bronk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Don’t see how that’s not the case now. Only thing missing is a universal harness, which it’ll probably be able to build itself soon, for sure humans can’t.