• Tja
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Let’s not let perfect be the enemy of good…

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        What if the good is greatly dimished by not perfection, but something totally reasonable or even expectable?

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        Pretty sure it would be better if they didn’t release anything at all. Then I wouldn’t be breaking the law if I sold both their product and replacement parts for their product

        • Tja
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          You can still do that

            • Tja
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              If they released nothing you wouldn’t be breaking the law because you wouldn’t be selling it.

              You still have to option of not selling it.

    • finkle@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 days ago

      Good question!

      It looks like Creative Commons non-commercial, according to the download page.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        So no reselling. I wonder if that prevents print shops from renting use of their 3d printers from a customer who doesn’t own a 3d printer.

        • _vote@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          From my understanding the last time I looked into this the way it works is that the printed model inherits the license. That means you can’t sell cc-noncommercial models directly, but if someone contracts a print shop and provides the model they can still pay someone to make it due to paying for a service and not that product.

          Though print shops seem to flagrantly violate this anyway without much issue.

    • Chewget@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Right. It’s pre-emptive to prevent people from profiting off of 3d printed replacements.