Titanium dioxide is the most widely used whitening pigment in the world and has been linked to adverse health effects, particularly genotoxicity and intestinal inflammation. It is applied as food coloring and a whitening agent to a wide variety of foods, including chewing gum, cakes, candies, breads and ice cream.

Because of health risks, France banned titanium dioxide as a food additive in 2020. Two years later the European Union also banned titanium dioxide as a food additive.

But in the U.S., titanium dioxide is found all over the grocery shelves. Candy like Skittles, Starbursts, and Jell-O, gum like Trident White peppermint gum and Mentos Freshmint Gum, cake products like Duncan Hines Creamy Vanilla Frosting, and Nabisco Chips Ahoy! cookies are just a few of the myriad food items that contain the additive.

A significant body of research, mostly from rodent models and in vitro studies, has linked titanium dioxide with health risks related to the gut, including intestinal inflammation, alterations to the gut microbiota, and more. It is classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in Group 2B, as possibly carcinogenic to humans.

As a food additive, titanium dioxide and its nanoparticles in particular have been associated with DNA damage and cell mutations, which in turn, have potential to cause cancer. When used as a food coloring, it is known as E171.

With the rise of nanotechnology, research in recent years has also shown the dangers of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles, and their genotoxicity, which refers to a chemical agent’s ability to harm or damage DNA in cells, thus potentially causing cancer.

    • Thassodar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      “Racism wouldn’t be so bad if people wouldn’t talk about it so much”

      • idiot ex friend
  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Banned in the EU not Europe. For example, the UK has not banned Titanium Dioxide, and published it’s own review in 2024. It concluded "that it is unlikely that there would be a risk to health from current UK dietary exposures of E171 TiO2.

    Source: UK Committee on Toxicity

    Also the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) did not conclude that Titanium Dioxide is unsafe but rather that it “could not exclude genotoxicity concerns after consumption of titanium dioxide particles.” In other words, as it couldn’t exclude the possibility of genotoxicity it has essentially used the precautionary principle to ban it.

    So it’s nuanced and not quite as dramatic as the article is making out. Scientific evidence may make it clearer that it is genotoxic in humans or even that it is safe. Personally I’m not a fan of adding any unnecessary materials to foods like this and think the EFSA’s approach is better when it comes to public health, but I’d say there are far more obvious issues with US foods than this particular additive. Hormone treated beef and chlorinated chicken are two obvious examples.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Banned in the EU not Europe. For example, the UK

      Good thing they left the European Union so they could have blue passports and toxic additives!

        • Ænima@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          UK has stricter food standards…

          Maybe for food safety, but not for taste or presentation! Hard to fail food safety when you only eat cardboard!!

          Read before commenting, please...

          This is all a joke and I hope you took it in stride. I couldn’t help but dunk on the trope of tasteless UK food. I meant no harm! ❤️

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The US doesn’t really chlorinate chicken anymore, and it never did in the way “chlorinated chicken” implies.
      It was common and is still permitted to wash chicken in the processing plant using a diluted bleach solution to eliminate any microbe contamination followed by a water rinse.
      This is very similar to the sanitizer solution used in restaurants in both the US and Europe to clean the plates you eat off of.
      No one in the EU ever claimed that it was a harmful practice on it’s own. The solution has also been replaced basically everywhere with a solution of vinegar and hydrogen peroxide, since it’s comparably effective and breaks down to water and oxygen relatively quickly. It’s also extremely diluted. (0.2%)

      The EUs concerns are that an antimicrobial wash is masking unsanitary practices further up the supply line, and that better results are achieved by maintaining hygiene throughout the entire supply chain.

      It’s just as accurate to say that most Europeans are drinking chlorinated water, and eating chlorinated seafood. (Drinking water is usually treated to around 1ppm, with food sanitizer being recommended to aim for 50 ppm and then holding at 5ppm. Wild caught seafood can’t meet the end to end hygiene requirements the EU aims for, so processing with a sanitizer rinse is permitted)

      It’s another case of people simplifying the nuance of the disagreement, because it’s harder to discuss when there’s no clear better answer.

      • reattach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        One clarification, because I happen to work with it: the hydrogen peroxide and vinegar (acetic acid) react to form peracetic acid (PAA, aka peroxyacetic acid/POAA), which is a stronger oxidizer than hydrogen peroxide. It is indeed used at many US poultry facilities.

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Always the fine line to try to walk of “how much detail is right”. :).

          Hoped to convey “disagreement is over process, not materials”, “what we used to use was safe, but we switched to something just as effective that’s safer for workers, and even less chance of residue”, and some examples beyond the EU food safety commission saying it’s about process to show that it’s about process.

          Just don’t want people to keep thinking Americans are eating contaminated chicken. It’s just not guaranteed to not need a disinfecting rinse

  • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 days ago

    worth noting that the EU banning this kicked off similar investigations in at least the UK, Australia/New Zealand, and Canada and none of them concluded that titanium dioxide is harmful… the EU is an outlier here, and not just because nobody else has followed up

    https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumer/foodtech/Review-of-titanium-dioxide-as-a-food-additive

    Our review found there is currently no evidence to suggest dietary exposure to food-grade titanium dioxide is a concern for human health.

        • Secret Music@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Still not sure how that snarky response applies though. Last I checked, skin is porous and creams get absorbed by the skin. So I’d say it’s still a valid concern.

          • Zenith@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            It depends on the size of the particle and what the particle is made of, titanium dioxide is not capable of penetrating your skin because it’s a solid and the solid particles are too large for direct absorption, something touching your skin in cream form does not actually mean it will definitely penetrate through your skin. Titanium is by its self considered a body safe metal, and dioxide means it contains two oxygen atoms and one atom of the main ingredient, titanium is a particularly large atom. This doesn’t mean that titanium dioxide should be being applied directly to the mucus membranes in your body, like in your intestines, but skin is significantly less permeable. Titanium dioxide in sunscreen is considered safe, it is not banned from use in the EU in sunscreens, it’s also considered environmentally safe, which is untrue of nonmineral sunscreens

            Don’t eat titanium dioxide but that doesn’t mean it’s not good for other things.

        • Ænima@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 days ago

          Ooooo boy, you don’t know what you’re missing! Its like glue, but less stigma for not being a crafting supply.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Its also used in most toothpastes, and often paired with zinc oxide in things like sunscreen and baby creams, but zinc mostly uses the non-nano particle ones.

  • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Might be banned in food, but I think it’s still present in some toothpastes in Europe.

  • console.log(bathing_in_bismuth)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    OK I saw this on an bottle of SPF 30 sunscreen. Its older though. FYI I don’t buy the whole TikTok shit about sunscreen conspiracies, so I am not denying the effectiveness and purpose of sunscreen.

    Should I make an report? Is it safe for skin?