• Meeech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      I wonder if they’re going to harness the temperatures of space itself to keep it cooled

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 days ago

        Space is technically cold, but only because the density of atmosphere is near zero. That means there are no molecules to absorb the heat like it would be not-in-space, so overheating is more of a problem because heat lost to radiation is slower.

        • espentan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 days ago

          I never really considered that. A heatsink in vacuum wouldn’t work very well at all. Thanks for making me think.

            • Securus777@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              Bigger heatsink would be the target, but you gotta get it up there. On moon is not a half bad idea. Bury the heatsink and use the moon itself might be the best idea, depending on how quickly it can absorb then dissipate the heat through the righlith. The side of the moon doesn’t matter as there isn’t an actual ‘dark side’ of the moon, just a side we can’t see do to tidal locking. That side still gets the same amount of sun.

  • Dogyote@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Two questions:

    1. Why?

    The satellites are part of ADA Space’s “Star Compute” program and the first of what it calls the “Three-Body Computing Constellation,”

    1. Why that name? I’ve read that book series and I’m now concerned.