• gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    There’s currently 5 million care workers in the US, at a total population of 332 million. Source

    That means that even if the birth rates drop really low and we only have 50 million workers in the next generation, it will still be enough to care for the elderly.

    However, it might not be enough to fill the last bullshit workplace some company makes up to make yet another dollar into the pockets of the rich.

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Old people, even those who rely on care workers directly, also rely on a lot of other types of workers. They need to eat, so some portion of the farmers, agricultural processors, logistics workers, cooks, dishwashers, etc. will need to continue to support the industries that feed people. Then the industries that feed people also rely on their own supply chains: equipment manufacturers and maintainers, electricity and energy, etc.

      Simply being alive relies on the work of others. Broadly speaking, we expect there to be a ratio of workers to the broader population, including those who are not working: children, students, disabled, elderly retirees, etc. If the workers stop working, the non-workers won’t be able to live.

      If there’s a one-person society, they basically will always need to work at least some to stay alive. If they’re incapacitated from age or injury, that might mean death, no matter how much they’ve accumulated up to that point.

      So no, I don’t think this is a uniquely capitalist problem. Non-capitalist societies have dealt with population collapse before, but those tend to impose real danger to the non-working elderly, and not all of them survive the turmoil.