In the latest unredacted document oopsie stemming from the US Federal Trade Commission’s efforts to stop Microsoft acqu…

    • lowleveldata
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh really? It’s not on the site for placing aggressive ads?

      • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you don’t have an ad blocker installed though, seriously, I can’t recommend getting one enough. It’s legit like night and day how different it is. There are occasional inconveniences, but it is overall so, so much better for browsing QoL.

      • Blizzard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        As far as I’m concerned, all ads are aggressive. I don’t want to see any ads, period. Using an adblocker is a norm. It’s not only a matter of civilized online experience but also privacy and security (latest example). Of course you are not required to use one, but don’t go online complaining you see ads.

        • lowleveldata
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not following. How am I supposed to let everyone knows that this site is shit without complaining?