Gingernate to Unixporn@lemmy.ml · 2 年前Im going to get banned for thisimagemessage-square123linkfedilinkarrow-up1567arrow-down1106
arrow-up1461arrow-down1imageIm going to get banned for thisGingernate to Unixporn@lemmy.ml · 2 年前message-square123linkfedilink
minus-squarePowerCrazy@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down5·edit-22 年前I am not a greybeard expert with deep bash history, but I though the posix compliant aspect of PowerShell was a very recent, though apparently not perfect, achievement even if “technically” NT was POSIX compliant by some specific definition in 1993.
minus-squareZeth0s@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-22 年前As far as I understand, these are posix requirements https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18 Powershell is not compliant with that document even now in the interactive part. Wsl2 is, as one can istall a standard Linux shell
I am not a greybeard expert with deep bash history, but I though the posix compliant aspect of PowerShell was a very recent, though apparently not perfect, achievement even if “technically” NT was POSIX compliant by some specific definition in 1993.
As far as I understand, these are posix requirements https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18
Powershell is not compliant with that document even now in the interactive part. Wsl2 is, as one can istall a standard Linux shell