image

  • jerry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate how weird the focus on arch installation is. I got attacked on reddit for calling endeavour arch. Like, I used that shitty method of installation in 1997, it’s tedious and there are better ways now.

    • Shareni
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re missing the point. Arco, Garuda, and Endeavour are all still Arch. Manjaro might’ve had the same Arch daddy, but then it got repeatedly dropped on its head as a baby and got really “special” along the way.

    • jaykstah@waveform.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah people definitely go overboard with that. I think the only real problem is that Arch-based distros might be using other repositories and not be completely sync’d with Arch itself so then users will go to Arch support forums or communities with problems that don’t affect vanilla arch. But I’ve never really cared when people using derivatives claim they’re on an Arch system.

      Installing isn’t even as big of an undertaking these days too, so it’s less of an achievement then people would like to think. Last time I did a clean install on my laptop I just ran the ‘arch-install’ script included on the vanilla ISO and it was super easy, lets you choose where you want it installed, pick from a list of desktop environments, and you pick between alternatives for other common packages then you’re good to go without having to do much manual work during the install itself.