• Dasnap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    147
    ·
    1 year ago

    The company said that it will still have opt-out controls in “select countries” without specifying which ones.

    • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      Opt-out is still illegal in many cases… a lot must be opt-in based. Typically consent must be freely given.

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It depends if someone bothers to sue them or not. In the EU court decisions until now point that profiling for advertising should be opt-in not opt-out but companies keep trying to find loopholes or at least hoping to not attract too much attention with their defaults.

        • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          In EU no one individual needs to sue them. The what-ever-the-office-might-be-responsible at EU burecracy will just send them an nicely worded letter that says “play by the book or we’ll give you fine big enough to bankrupt you no matter how much money you think you have”. The fine is based on company revenue (or sales, I don’t remember what it spesifically was) and there’s no way you’ll weasel yourself out of that no matter how many american lawyers you can hire. The same folks forced Apple to adapt usb-c, so good luck Spez if you try to challenge that.

          • BlueBockser
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            One small correction: There is no EU office responsible for GDPR enforcement, the EU member states are responsible for handling GDPR breaches within their jurisdiction (Art. 51 GDPR). As an individual you can also file a complaint against offenders (Art. 77 GDPR).